ELECTRONIC
HARASSMENT: helpful suggestion
|
|||||||||
|
links interni del sito correlati con questo: Associazione italiana, scientifica e giuridica, contro gli abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici Pagina medico-scientifica Opinioni o peggio: accuse? Opinion or accusation? Per concludere... / accomplishment Links Europei contro la Pedofilia, il Settarismo e gli Abusi Strutturati e/o Rituali Links e citazioni su segnali di pericolo Segnalazioni di Allarme: Internazionali Testimonianze e dubbi Microchips impiantati nel corpo umano e altre sopraffazioni e violazioni Delgado e Skinner Psychocivilization and its discontents Attenzione alle informazioni fornite da autori sospetti Flashbacks STOA: Parlamento Europeo Cinque libri legati da un unico filo Aiuto diretto all'infanzia sofferente senza implicazioni di ordine politico, razziale o confessionale Dal sito dell'Ingegner Giuseppe Muratori: "NUOVO" WORLD INTELLIGENCE FOUNDATION The Guilt-free Soldier (renewed / rinnovato) Complex Trauma and Disorders of Extreme Stress SIrUS Project Sabotage Photos and List Mind Control Victim Awarded $1 Million Mr. Andrzej Suda's case (in Indymedia) Documentation / documentazione Presentazione come artista / Artist Suda: Presentation Kathleen Sullivan's page: Memory recovery and screen memories LarsonReport-Edit.pdf Targeting the Human with Directed Energy Weapons: Dr. Reinhard Munzert |
|||||||||
|
NUOVISSIME TECNOLOGIE? ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES? TECHNOLOGIES AVANCEES? SPITZENTECHNOLOGIEN? ![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
In case you are, I've
enclosed below a "form letter" I
send
to all who write in and say they are victims of mind control:Hi - |
||
1. AVOID COMPLAINING TO THE AUTHORITIES IF AT ALL POSSIBLEFor example, one victim came back to his van unexpectedly, and found two men with "Secret Service" on the backs of their jackets hastily leaving the vehicle. He found nothing stolen, and no "bugs" planted. This was an obvious case of "sucker bait", the goal being to get this victim to complain long and loud that the Secret Service is harassing him, which would result in discreditation of that victim in the eyes of the authorities. As a general rule, the best way to avoid doubling your torture (by having the authorities lock you up and imposing psychiatric "treatment" which is legalized torture) is to not complain to the authorities. "Authorities", meaning police and doctors, and "complaining" meaning seeking relief for your *personal* torment. You can usually safely complain to the PUBLIC, as long as you stress DOCUMENTED FACTS, and NOT your *personal* situation. In locations where family members can get you locked up on their say-so, avoid complaining to them as well. Those who complain to the authorities regularly about their *personal* situation are inviting extra torture. 2. AVOID TYING YOUR COMPLAINTS TO **ANY** SPECIFIC TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY If you complain to the
authorities that you are being
targetted by "satellites"
or "implants" or "microwave" or any other SPECIFIC type of technology,
you have just made it much easier for the authorities to discredit
you.
The authorities can xray you for implants and find none, or sweep your
home for microwave and find none, or point a signal analyzer at the sky
and find nothing out of the ordinary, and you are then discredited, and
to some extent so are the rest of us. Other
efforts to break government secrecy include: There are three sources for this: - By
FAR the best - U.S. "Patriot" radio on
shortwave. http://www.raven1.net/shortwav.htm (no "e" at end)At the moment, Alex Jones in Austin, Texas is the most prolific and possibly best quality show. His web site is: http://www.infowars.com "Patriots" with an upper
case "P" are U.S. citzens who are
extremely
upset with the rapid collapse of original Constitutional freedoms and
principles,
and fight back with public education. They are not the same as
groups
called "Militias", though both Militias (armed groups) and Patriots
(unarmed)
are motivated by threats to individual freedom and are usually opposed
to globalization and one world government. 2. THE TECHNOLOGY IS NOT SIMPLE.Very sophisticated, classified electronic warfare and psychological operations intelligence weapons technology can target every nerve of the body with scientific precision. So called "mind control" weapons have been compared to the atomic bomb in their effect on the human nervous system, especially the brain. See CAHRA website for numerous citations: http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh Read Dr.
Tom Bearden's opinion on
the technology: http://www.raven1.net/tb2margo.htm
4. CONSTANTLY learn and review FACTS, over and over.Rehearse your spiel
constantly. Keep trying to think of
ways to
get the story told in fewer, bolder words and phrases. snip... |
||
|
which you can join: mc-subscribe@topica.com
... one BLANK email, then WAIT for confirmation you are registered mc@topica.com
...to post your thoughts after you receive confirmation Again, see http://www.raven1.net/qkadvice.htm for suggested criteria to test for genuine countermeasures and genuine detection. See http://www.raven1.net/disinfo.htm for a writeup on the subject of disinfo agents. - Emails written by
people who know
technical jargon
but use it in ways showing they don't understand the fundamentals
behind
the terms. 8. **
IMPORTANT
**
|
||
Consigli spiccioli / small advicesIn general, any hobby or volunteer work is an excellent way to fight off the hoplessness that consumes victims who try to "hide under their beds", hoping the perps will not torture them as much. That flat out doesn't work. If one cannot be an activist, then at least engage in activities so that the torture isn't your whole life. Yes, the perps will interfere, but you have to realize that these perps are the ultimate losers, who will pay dearly for their decision to choose torture as a career path. Their payback is as close as the day of their death. Confirmed solidly by near-death experiences of nasty people many times. Finally, there are two "comebacks" to questions from skeptics which I will offer you here to assist with your dealings with others, be they authorities, medics, or family, friends and business associates. These are from a larger collection of information relative to public speaking, but I've found are especially handy. The full page is at: http://www.raven1.net/spiel.htm Here are the excerpts: 1. When someone says: |
||
|
With due respect doctor, have you been schooled in covert government projects in mind control? Are you aware of MKULTRA? Are you aware that MKULTRA was heard in the U.S. Senate but was never actually stopped? Are you aware of the FBI's COINTELPRO activities? Are you aware that many human radiation experiment victims were labelled 'the crazies' before President Clinton admitted their complaints were valid?In one encounter I had, the doctor simply stood up, and told me we had nothing further to discuss and wished me a nice day. Verbal comebacks are very valuable defensive weapons. ![]() Psichiatri e medici ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:48:38 -0800 Subject: Re: > MK Friendly Therapists The following tips
may be useful for those who seek safe 'counseling' or even more serious
psychiatric helps -- especially suspected MPD/DID victims.
1) Be personally responsible. Don't take someone else's advice or referral. Don't use a referral service, especially one provided by government, agency, or professional organization. Rather, do it yourself. The help of a friend or relative is acceptable in the process, but limit their help to stepwise help, such as transportation, and not advice or decision making. If I had my choice, I'd say no helpers whatsoever. 2) Be cautious. Do not discuss your intentions or stepwise actions anywhere there may be electronic eavesdropping or, if you fear it, thought sensing technology in use. Find a safe environment or method for communications, and avoid unnecessary communications. Involve as few people as possible, use as few steps as possible. 3) Go away. Do not select someone convenient, but plan on a city well away from your own. Try to find someone who can see you right away, or get an appointment and come back, then. My book offers tips on how to avoid being followed, and to defeat commonly used tracking devices. If you fear bioimplants, it may be wise to attempt to deal with those, first -- also in the book. If your situation is that bad, you should probably taking a close look at your home security, too -- pick proof locks, etc. 4) Be choosy and prejudicial. Grab a phone book and scan the choices. Avoid large practices. Avoid Doctors who work in medical schools or clinics which partake in research of any kind. Avoid very fresh doctors, and doctors who have been around since the 60s, or doctors with degrees from any of the schools known to have been involved in MC experiments. That is a long list, and yet incomplete. A copy of my list of 400 CIA involved entities, which was originally at the American Federation of Scientist's Web site, can now be found at: http://www.totse.com/ Note that those names after the colons (:) in the list are the SOURCE of the information, not themselves perps. Of the 400, fully half are MC related. A good number of these are schools. An ideal Doctor might have been in practice since the 80s. When you call, you can ask about these things. They will tell you, because they think those things are great qualifications that will sell you on their skills. I suggest you choose a Doctor from a minority race, as they are less likely to have fascist leanings, and more likely to be true humanitarians. Make sure they fit your needs based on your suspected problem (i.e., ever done work with MPD/DID) and financial capabilities - since we can assume you won't be covered by insurance. Perhaps you are, in which case, they must be accepted by your carrier. One problem there, is that insurance companies often require a referral from your physician in order to authorize payment. Bad decision to take that route. 5) Be coy to helpers, but more open to the doctor. Do not give details of your situation but describe it in generic terms. DO NOT MENTION MIND CONTROL or perps in any form. Discuss ONLY symptoms of concern, those which others would use against you to imply mental problems. Once you have accepted each other, and initial treatment interviews begin, lay it out on the line (see next.) 6) Explain your true situation as you see it, the situation as others see it (as many variants as there are). Ask the doctor if he knows what political control technology is, how it works, and its current state of the art. If he is honest, he will likely confess little understanding. Ask if he would be willing to review some materials on the technology before treatment begins in earnest. If he says yes, offer him a copy of my newsletter on political control technology, or a copy of my book (I WILL SEND HIM ONE, FREE if you have him contact me - but advise him to use cc so you know it is actually being done.) You might consider circling those technologies you think used on you, or those definitions which apply to your situation. If he/she will do this, you have found a decent choice, and are relatively safe to proceed. 7) Be OPEN. Do not assume the doctor is a perp just because they initially seem to find against victimization. If sensing this is their opinion, ask what they might consider acceptable PROOF to the contrary. They will suggest some things. Somewhere in there may be an opportunity. One such proof, for instance, is drug treatment for the suspected mental ailment. If you agree to take the prescription and the symptoms do not go away, that is a kind of proof. Confirm that with the doctor before agreeing to take such a prescription. 8) Get an agreement. Make certain your fine print does not give the doctor absolute authority on your life, and that if you check in voluntarily, you can also check out voluntarily at any time, for any reason. Get the doctor to agree that if there is a finding in your favor that he will completely document his finding and give you a copy. Let it be understood that a second opinion will be sought if there is disagreement on findings. DO THAT. Be sure to get a complete understanding on side effects of a given treatment you might choose to undergo. Be leary of eagerly accepting reuptake inhibitors and the like because they can be enablers to MC processes. They are not in and of themselves the problem, however, and may be quite critical to demonstrating imporoper diagnosis. Thus, you may need accept the risk of taking these, but as a rule, I suggest avoidance if there is an alternative -- or if possible avoidance of MC processes while under treatment (i.e., temporary bed down in a facility - don't view it as a mental ward, but a hotel room.) If your doctor is unsympathetic to this concern (other than because there is no possible alternative), you might need move on to another choice. 9) Be smart. If you do not get a useful finding, but instead are diagnosed with some ailment, accept the treatment for that ailment. ONLY if there is no improvement under treatment, can you ILLUSTRATE the dignosis is WRONG. I'm sure others may have some additional good advice based on personal experience. I'd like to hear form you if that is the case. I wanted to let you all know that when you see something that you may think > is important
that feel free to send in the url for the site or article..
Generally
a good idea, xxx, but there needs to be some thought given before
doing the sending: > On new articles in local papers and such. if you have access to a scanner or > copier gets some and you can send them to either myself or eleanor. - Scanned documents are IMAGES, and are THOUSANDS of times larger than TEXT. - I have dial up service. Scanners, unless you know how to CROP a newspaper clipping, will mean each scan will be MEGABYTE size - It's a good idea to email your recipient a DESCRIPTION of an article you think needs posting before going to all the trouble of transmitting it. Because my site is large and gets a lot of hits ("large bandwidth"), I am very picky about what I post. I only post maybe 2 or 3 percent of all articles recommended to me. - Consider sending the original publication data, like the name of the newspaper, magazine, TV or radio show, the date, the author, then just EXCERPT the most relevant information. An example of excerpting is: http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm That voice to skull excerpt is only perhaps one eighth of the full article. (KEEP the full article in your files, though.) - Articles which have already received WIDE publicity I don't post. An example is the Marine Corps' microwave heat gun. Everyone knows about it, so it doesn't really tell the public anything new. - Technology which can't penetrate WALLS I don't usually post because it is the through wall ability of the MC perp equipment which is unique and which the public needs to know about. - Conventional technology articles, for example on microwave transmission or cell phone systems are on the web in HUGE numbers, but they don't add anything useful towards persuading the public. I don'tì post conventional technology articles unless the conventional technology can perform some sort of through the wall mind weapon effects. - Some good article topics might be: - Mind reading technology, especially with NO wires - Visual image reading technology - Picking up sounds heard by way of brain activity - Local police using through wall radar - Criminal intent scanning with NO wires - Exotic physics experiments which show entirely new physics principles, such as levitation, travel faster than light, spooky action at a distance, interdimensional activity (must be WITNESSED, DOCUMENTED, and ACCEPTED AS REAL by mainstream scientists) - Remote viewing successes which are witnessed documented, and accepted as real by mainstream scientists - Articles about a breakthrough in exposing MAJOR government crimes. Because these are not mind control, it would have to be really Earth-shaking for me to post it. In deciding if an article about the above topics is useful, the source of the article must be mainstream, because we need to convince the public and extremely reluctant authorities. If it won't convince the public, it is probably not worth posting. * My own view is that I would not post articles from Paranoia magazine or MKzine. MKzine contains references to Paranoia magazine, and in my view, the publication of our stories in a magazine titled 'Paranoia' could be a deliberate attempt to put our stories on public record under one of the worst subject titles imaginable. ...snip... * RENAME ARTICLES WHEN SAVING. The original file names are often just serial numbers, useless for getting an idea of what a file contains on your hard drive. Keep the letters after the period, such as: .asp, .jsp, .shtml, .htm, ...and just change the name before the period. > for websites
go down all the time and / or change address with out any
snip...> redirection. > If you hard drive is not large enough to do things like this let us know > also and we could preserve it. With new articles and such they only keep > them on for so long and then there are removed to archives and you have to > purchase the article, to view the whole thing. > Personally I have archived and saved a few website to my drive that are no > longer available, one that was a good site > was removed because of threats and they > offer the cd it you care to have it. > Pictures are also important too. as they show things that might not be so > easily explained with words. > So if you can't send in the urls to myself or Eleanor if she wishes. ![]() Author Harry Sweeney sent along this advice on how to NOT sound paranoid when speaking (or writing): Harry Sweeney wrote: REMIND
everyone how not to sound paranoid. These are the top five tips from
the Professional Paranoid:
1) Avoid using 'them' and 'they' too much unless a SPECIFIC reference to a SPECIFIC KNOWN GROUP which is identified in the dialog. Other 'paranoidal sounding' trigger words to avoid are 'conspiracy', 'CIA',FBI', etc. These, however, can be used when the context is reasonableand conforms to the other rules of advice below. 2) Avoid CONCLUSIONS and instead stick to known FACTS - let the listenereither draw conclusions or ask questions about what you THINK it means.When answering, be honest but use QUALIFIERS like 'might' 'could' and 'perhaps' but ALSO provide any logical INNOCENT or less conspiratorialalternative explanations to show you are open to knowing the truth which every way it falls. 3)
Don't DWELL too long on minutia - be
generic in general and providedetails only when ASKED. Too many details
is the hallmark of someone whothinks they have to PROOVE every little
point or no one will believethem. While in truth, this is sometimes the
case, there is a subtle but powerful differnce in being able to ANSWER
questions and VOLUNTEERINGthe material in advance.
4) Never make sweeping statements or accussations unless prepared tooffer concrete proofs or examples. It is OK to make generalizations aslong as prefaced with descriptives such as 'It is my belief...' or 'Onepossibility is...' and liberal QUALIFIERS. 5) Reference
witnesses, proofs, or resources whenever possible,especially if well
known and/or mainstream - things that support theviability of your
presentation. You don't want to be an island in a seaof disbelief.
H. Michael Sweeney Subject: on psychiatry as method of discreditation Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:12:44 -0400 From: xxxx Date sent: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:06:27 +0100 Subject: How they discredit us If we victims of what one
victim calls "the 2-way telepathy" can keep our sanity, despite the
ordeal we
are put through, and can educate ourselves about what we are
fighting
against, and will band together, we can become a powerful army
against the
regime that perpetrates this outrage against us, and perhaps bring
about
political changes that will spare humanity great suffering,
worldwide, for
many generations to come.
In my experience, the perpetrators try to drive insane any of their victims who show signs of potential political militancy, after realising that they are under attack. They try to drive them insane in the the eyes of the psychiatric establishment, and hence their families, their neighbours, the police, politicians and the courts. This impairs the ability of those would-be militant victims whom they are successful in driving insane to become effective "soldiers" in the "powerful army" I mentioned earlier, because of the stigma of psychiatric diagnosis and the consequent discrediting of their testimony. I dare say that the perpetrators have many methods of driving their victims insane. But, there are two methods of doing this that I think they use particularly often: Method 1: The perpetrators try to con their victims into believing passionately that they have implants, when impants probably aren't needed AT ALL for modern "2-way telepathy" weapons. The victims then demand of medical doctors that they should be prescribed "scans" (to find the chips they have been tricked into thinking have been implanted in them, so that the chips can be removed). The scans show nothing abnormal (because there's nothing there to find!) and the victims end up getting sectioned, as "deluded". The perpetrators have won. (2) Method 2: The perpetrators try to persuade the victims that the >victim's neighbours, or even their family members, are "in on it" (the conspiracy), perhaps along with thousands of other ordinary people (like supermarket cashiers and traffic wardens) in their own neighbourhoods. Eventually, the victims confront, or make a complaint to the police against, somebody who is actually wholly innocent. Thus they come to the attention of the authorities, and end up getting sectioned, as "paranoid". Again, the perpetrators have won. That our harrassment
continues everywhere we go, even overseas, should teach us that
either (a) the true
perpetrators are elements who are extravagantly well-funded and
ruthless,
such as the intelligence services, or (b) that we ARE mad after
all, and really
ARE "imagining", as the psychiatrists might think we are, a
non-existent
2-way telepathy, everywhere we go, simply because everywhere we go, we
take with us the diseased brains which are
causing us to imagine non-existent abuse. Any other explanation for the ubiquity of abuse involves resorting to a proliferation of ever more fanciful conjectures, such as the desperate, face-saving conjecture that a bully living on a particular housing estate, who happens somehow, almost miraculously, to have acquired one of the most advanced, and classified, psychotronic weapons known to man, has tipped off a waiter in a distant holiday resort, a waiter who happens also to be just as nasty as his contact in back home in the postulated international criminal network, and, coincidentally, also to be armed with a similar classified psychotronic weapon as his counterpart back home. The local bully has tipped of the holiday resort peasant that a new victim has arrived in his village, and is part of the caseload of this bunch of working class hi-tech human rights abusers. |
||
|
Look
at Illuminati-news
and - with caution and a
bit of
mistrust - go to the book Illuminati
666: Book 2
|
||
|
Links di organizzazioni e iniziative protettive
Associazione italiana, scientifica e giuridica, contro gli abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici
Microchips impiantati nel corpo umano e altre sopraffazioni e violazioni.
Nuovissime tecnologie? Advanced technologies? Technologies avancées? Spitzentechologien?
Artist/Designer Andrzej Suda's case (also present in Indymedia) e Artist Suda: Presentation ma basilare è quanto si trova raccolto in /of maximum interest is what is gathered on Andrzej (Andrew) Suda's DOCUMENTATION / DOCUMENTAZIONE (with its .html version and related pictures.)