Mind Control Victim Awarded $1 Million

UP-TO-DATE DOSSIERS di/of It's Abuse NOT Science fiction = Gli Abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici NON sono Fantascienza

Dalla presentazione dettagliata del libro It's Abuse NOT Science fiction, e dalla data di pubblicazione - 14 luglio 2005 - molto è cambiato e molti DOCUMENTI sono stati sia sostituiti che aggiunti. In attesa di una completa nuova edizione del volume principale ne viene per ora edito un SUPPLEMENTO INTEGRATIVO per meglio diffondere questi IMPORTANTI UP-TO-DATE DOSSIERS. in una NUOVA PUBBLICAZIONE che si costituisce come autonomo VOLUME.
*************************
The book previously published at present needs to be modified.
It's Abuse NOT Science fiction published on July 14 2005 shortly became OUT OF DATE and so required to present also the consequent novelties coming from readers comments, from new deeds and on MOSTLY from present-day flash-back discolosures. UP-TO-DATE DOSSIERS of It's Abuse NOT Science fiction = Gli Abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici NON sono Fantascienza for the time being launched as supplementary book, supplementary but matching also by itself not only for propose simple improvement, rather to share some new particular important DOCUMENTS.

Vedi sullo stesso tema anche articoli in italiano:
RITI SATANICI, TRAFFICO D'ORGANI E PEDOFILIA. LA DRAMMATICA TESTIMONIANZA DI UNA GIOVANE VITTIMA
(Giovanni Caporaso e M. Cocozza Lubisco,
Bambini. Il mercato degli orrori, in Avvenimenti, 17 luglio 1991).
E per quanto accade in Italia vedi anche come esempio: 
Un mercato di bambini dietro il delitto di Imperia
- La Repubblica Cronaca dal nostro inviato ROBERTO BIANCHIN 21 agosto 2000

Crimen sollicitationis

Sex crimes and Vatican Crimini sessuali e Vaticano (documentario sottotitolato in italiano)

 Video che smaschera le gerarchie ecclesiastiche per avere coperto i preti pedofili ...

Un video della BBC (con sottotitoli in italiano) che ognuno dovrebbe vedere per capire come le gerarchie ecclestiastiche della chiesa cattolica romana coprono i preti pedofili. Testimonianze dirette di pesone violentate da preti.

La Storia di Marco
Pedofilia nella Chiesa Cattolica Italiana: Eccellenza, lei sapeva e taceva
INERTE E INDIFFERENTE, IL VESCOVO DI AGRIGENTO NON DENUNCIA IL PRETE CHE ABUSA. PARLA UNA VITTIMA.

Marco Marchese, la vittima che ha sporto denuncia, ha subìto abusi nel seminario arcivescovile di Agrigento a partire dall'età di 12 anni. Oggi ne ha 22, ha lasciato il seminario nel 2000 e, a vicenda giudiziaria conclusa, ci tiene a sottolineare che non era il carcere per il suo "carnefice" lo scopo della sua azione, ma l'emersione di un fenomeno che causa sofferenza indicibile a tanti bambini, con la speranza inoltre che la Chiesa abbia il coraggio di mettersi dalla parte degli offesi. La risposta del vescovo a quella lettera, alla condanna del prete ed alla legittima richiesta di risarcimento da parte di Marchese (che ha già dichiarato di voler utilizzare i soldi eventualmente ricevuti per le attività della sua associazione di lotta alla pedofilia) è stata una controcitazione con la richiesta di 200.000 euro per i danni che la denuncia dell'abusato avrebbe arrecato all'"immagine" e al "prestigio" della Chiesa di Agrigento.

Don Puleo è stato condannato a due anni e sei mesi di reclusione....

Televideo 21/05/2007 23:21

Prete condannato, risarcirà seminarista

Prete condannato, risarcirà seminarista Un seminarista di Agrigento è stato risarcito per gli abusi sessuali subiti da un prete mentre frequentava il seminario. Il sacerdote aveva già patteggiato la pena di due anni e mezzo. Ora è stato raggiunto tra le parti anche un accordosul risarcimento. Il giovane ha deciso di destinare la somma ad un'associazione, da lui fondata, che si occupa del disagio giovanile e promuove campagne di sensibilizzazione sulle violenze a danno dei minori.

Two counts are alleged against the defendant: King in the complaint. Count V alleges a conspiracy with public officers to deprive the plaintiff of his civil rights, designed to continue to subject the plaintiff to emotional abuse and to prevent him from informing authorities of criminal conduct. Count VIII charges battery, false imprisonment, infliction of emotional distress, negligence and conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff of civil rights. Between December 1980 and 1988, the complaint alleges, the defendant King continually subjected the plaintiff to repeated sexual assaults, false imprisonments, infliction of extreme emotional distress, organized and directed satanic rituals, forced the plaintiff to "scavenge" for children to be a part of the defendant King's sexual abuse and pornography ring, forced the plaintiff to engage in numerous masochistic orgies with other minor children. The defendant King's default has made those allegations true against him. The issue now is the relief to be granted monetarily. 
The now uncontradicted evidence is that the plaintiff has suffered much. He has suffered burns, broken fingers, beating of the head and face and other indignities by the wrongful actions of the defendant King. In addition to the misery of going through the experiences just related over a period of eight years, the plaintiff has suffered the lingering results to the present time. He is a victim of multiple personality disorder, involving as many as fourteen distinct personalities aside from his primary personality. He has given up a desired military career and received threats on his life. He suffers from sleeplessness, has bad dreams, has difficulty in holding a job, is fearful that others are following him, fears getting killed, has depressing flashbacks, and is verbally violent on occasion, all in connection with the multiple personality disorder and caused by the wrongful activities of the defendant King.
Almost certainly the defendant King has little remaining financial resources, but a fair judgment to compensate the plaintiff is necessary. For the sixteen years since the abuse of the plaintiff began I conclude that a fair compensation for the damages he has suffered is $800,000. A punitive damage award also is justified, but the amount needs to be limited because of the small effect that such a judgment would have on the defendant King, given his financial condition and presence in prison. I deem the punitive damage award of $200,000 to be adequate.
Dated February 19, 1999.
By the Court
/s/Warren UrbornUnited States Senior District Judge

During the several months that the documentary was being prepared and advertised for showing, major legislation impacting the entire future of the Cable T.V. industry was being debated on Capitol Hill. Legislation, which the industry opposed, was under debate for placing controls on the industry and the contents of what could be shown. Messages were delivered in no uncertain terms from key politicians involved in the cable T.V. battle, that if the ‘Conspiracy of Silence’ were shown on the Discovery Channel as planned, then the industry would probably lose the debate. An agreement was reached. ‘Conspiracy of Silence’ was pulled, and with no rights for sale or broadcast by any other program; Yorkshire T.V. would be reimbursed for the costs of production; the Discovery Channel itself would never be linked to the documentary ; and copies of ‘Conspiracy of Silence’ would be destroyed.

A farmer reported he saw a flash of light, heard an explosion, and saw the plane plunge to the ground .The eyewitness account of the flash of light and the explosion was on the early edition of television news in Nebraska, but was pulled from subsequent reports which said that the plane exploded on impact. (p. 2-3) 

Many of the issues and allegations you raise have either been addressed, are rumor, or are so vague and nebulous as to defy resolution by diligent investigation. 

We are assuming Mr. Gunderson that in the preparation of your letter of January 3,1992, you have done more than simply parrot unsubstantiated allegations made to you orally or which you may have picked up in written material reviewed and therefore have specific information to back up your concerns, hence the above request. We will keep certain other matters under advisement. In the meantime though, you are encouraged to send us any specific, substantiating material available to you regarding any one or more of the other items mentioned in your correspondence. Sincerely Yours, Don Stenberg, Attorney General.

In May, 1992, John De Camp, Attorney representing Paul Bonacci, and former long-term Nebraska State Senator, wrote The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska. This book exposed the Franklin satanic cult/sex/drug ring and the cover-up by the Grand Jury, police and FBI. John De Camp advises in Chapter 14, of his book,

The Justice Department acting through the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s office in Omaha emerges from the record of the Franklin investigation not so much as a party to the cover-up, but as it’s coordinator, rigging grand juries, harassment of witnesses, incitement to perjury, and tampering with evidence - federal personnel were seen to apply all these techniques in the Franklin case (p. 182). Chapter 14 sets forth numerous instances of documentation that back up this statement.