| |
La data e l'ora segnata su questa immagine indicano quando sono stati attuati i cambiamenti autorizzati. L'immagine senza ora e ROSSA indica un tentativo fraudolento di INTRUSIONE: si prega quindi di avvertire al più presto il webmaster. / Date below and hour on the "seal" mark authorized changes. Fraudolent ones get the "seal" become RED without hour: if so please let us know as soon as possible. |
July 27 2010
Opinion or accusation?
#site _Search_engine, #assunption, #aphorisms, #watch(*), definition(**), #question_marks, #white_phosphorus, #purposes, #titles-content(*), #facts_not_opinions, #real-rational, #newspapers-data, #lobotomy, #advanced_technologies,
(*) new (**)renewed
Site's Search Engine
--
Sleeping reason breeds monsters and monsters? Then it is compelling to WATCH, to WATCH. to WATCH. Ever should be rejected not documented mere asserptions together with not probed even oneself's own feelings. DOUBTS must be ever the foremost GUIDES for sustaining to MIND and WIDE RANGE AWARENESS.
To consider a better understanding of the whole professional and cultural endeavor and not only of the site and books go to Home page, completed by Presentazione dello Statuto e dei Principi dell'Associazione, or also in English with the large, renewed file Presentazione e indice ragionato: come cominciare / Preamble: how to begin. The Parte terza: violazioni medicalizzate / medical violence - with the preparatory and miscellaneous chapter Pagina scientifico-medica - holds a widespread and continually renewed input on regard of deliberate medical malpractice.
Pagina scientifico-medica
Presentazione dello Statuto e dei principi dell'Associazione
Links e citazioni su segnali di pericolo
Segnalazioni di Allarme: Internazionali
Links Europei contro la Pedofilia, il Settarismo e gli Abusi Strutturati e/o Rituali
Ringraziamenti / Aknowledgement and thanks
Crucial: since holding true testimony and authenticated documents - any way mostly in Italian:
ESPERIMENTI SU BAMBINE/I
e related pdf
to be completed with IL PREZZO DEL POTERE, only with a short English excerpt
Objects are surely better "sincere witnesses" NUOVISSIME TECNOLOGIE? Advanced Technologies? Technologies Avancées? Spitzentechnologien?
to be completed and assessed by Pseudo-misteri e coinvolgimenti biologici / Fake-mysteries on biological targets
The Guilt-free Soldier
Artist/Designer Andrzej Suda's case, (Andrew) Suda: Presentation / Presentazione come artista
Andrzej (Andrew) Suda's DOCUMENTATION / DOCUMENTAZIONE
Suda correct pdf with its original pictures (*)
LarsonReport-Edit.pdf
LarsonReport.htm
TOTEM and TABOO: awful and fertile rise of new superstition
Delgado & Skinner
Psychocivilization and its discontents
Per concludere / Accomplisment
Modificazioni e novità
Another Web site and its related books expound explicit or only alluding considerations explaining our point of view and their roots: go to Consciousness and memory, My guides... my roots; besides the English index which endorses our basics as a real statement of meaning.
Arguments almost alike the ones held on this site can be read on the other site' one already published on its related book
Opinion, fact, complaint
For deeper and scientific information
Anamnesis? A way for healing...
and again on: Consciousness and memory
a parallel, even little different, page:TOTEM and TABOO: awful and fertile rise of new superstition
Sorry: only in Italian:
IMBROGLIO E ' I L CONTRARIO DI SVILUPPO. Dalla 'violenza contro il bambino' a 'tempo di mutamenti' e a 'la meglio gioventù
Cosa
ho in comune io con gli schiavi? Piero, Ada e la scuola della
libertà
Quando la cartella clinica è terapeutica
Every kinks and quotation will be continually refreshed by
Please do not copy or re-use without permission. All rights reserved. All Content © unless otherwise noted. Listing
is not necessarily endorsement. This listing is not meant to be
comprehensive.
Any way his site and every inner files are Copyright; moreover the ones which subjects are not only serious as much also dangerous: we warn every one to copy and paste without asking ourselves - moreover without quoting our REAL SOURCE - as happened more than once besides also awkwardly and/or into awkward sites. Si diffida dal copiare o usare in altri modi senza esplicito permesso il contenuto o anche singole parti. All rights reserved. All Content © unless otherwise noted. Files more often damaged will be put on PDF version to be also pinted on PAPER. To better share the argument of Esperimenti su Bambine/i FIRST HAND written testimonies and real f amily's photo album, parts of files of this site regarding "children" will become chapters of new thematic booklets published as up-dates of the Italian book - pertaining to another site - Bambini di ieri = adulti di oggi. Adulti di oggi -> adulti di domani Some
files begin with quotes summarizing and/or only alluding
to define basics and meaning, purpose and disclaimer regarding Web site
and related books, but a very IMPORTANT totally DEDICATED page - Presentazione
e diffide/Press-release
- MUST be read
almost ever as key introduction
of the whole matter.
It'ìs
Abuse NOT Science fiction / Gli Abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici NON
sono Fantascienza
 This powerful, more puzzling creative modification of the Goya's Sleep of reason - marked by the official Copyright - here is used as book cover's image, and explained by the Designer: Andrzej (Andrew) Suda: should look just like many of the events described by the victims: they exist, are bothersome, and we don’t know exactly WHY they are there but they are there… About the Book This book not only documents the case of Andrzej Suda, it is also filled with documentation from the worlds most influential documented cases of psychological abuse, electronic harassment, organized stalking and mind control. Some cases include Rauni Leena Kilde MD., Dr. Reinhard Munzert, Kathy Sullivan, David Larson, and many others... Please support the truth with the purchase of our book. This will document many technologies and mind control weapons that have been kept hidden from the mainstream public. Over 600 pages of action packed TRUTH |
|||||||||||||
The
2005 book It's
Abuse NOT
Science Fiction required to be UP
DATED, to share the consequent novelties.
Further this principal book will be printed on a real new edition
to
wholly gather its changes: but for the
time being
with the previous title integrated by the words UP-TO-DATE
DOSSIERS
- the Association launched a supplementary
book
- supplementary but authoritative and self-sufficient not only for
propose simple improvement, rather mostly to share new
important TESTIMONIES.
This file is its 2 chapter;
any way
excerpts
of this
page can be already reached also as file on another Web site
and as chapter 15 on the derived
book - From
children of YESTERDAY to
adults of TOMORROW
(Abebooks.com, Alibris.com, Webster.it,
BooksinPrint.com, also
on Kindle,
GlobalBooksinPrint.com). The book previously published at present needs to be modified. It's Abuse NOT Science fiction published on July 14 2005 shortly became OUT OF DATE and so required somehow to be UP DATED: then here suits to present also the consequent novelties coming from readers comments, from new deeds and MOSTLY on present-day flash-back discolosures - to note that for some victims it is easier to write than to speak. UP-TO-DATE DOSSIERS of It's Abuse NOT Science fiction = Gli Abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici NON sono Fantascienza for the time being is supplementary book, supplementary but matching also by itself not only for propose simple improvement, rather to share some new particular important FIRST HAND documents: on book as chapter 2 To a better use of the site: Supplement: Up-to-date Dossiers  Corso
Marconi 34/a 10125 Torino
(ITALY) info@cortinalibri.it,
Phone: 0039 0116507074 / 00390116508665 Fax: 00390116502900 ORDERS also onlibrerie italiane, Ibs. Aphorismsil
faut garder sa liberte' d'esprit
Pluralitas
non est
ponenda sine necessitate (?)et croire que DANS LA NATURE L'ABSURDE SUIVANT NOS THEORIES N'EST PAS TOUJOURS IMPOSSIBLE. History will have to record that the Greatest Tragedy of this period of Social Transition was NOT the strident clamor of the Bad People, but the APPALLING SILENCE of the good people. Je ne suis pas d'accord avec ce que vous dites, mais je defendrai jusqu'à la mort votre droit à le dire It's
Abuse NOT
Science Fiction (???)
Perhaps
it is a universal truth that the loss
of liberty at home is to be
charged to
provisions against danger, real or pretended, from abroad.The
greatest dangers
to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal,
well meaning
but without
understanding.
Justice
Louis
Brandeis, 1928
The
risk is to sliding into a culture
of resentment. such
logic leds to the creation of a culture
of
resentment, whose
only solution was to do away with the
"other".
The fact is, the culture of resentment – pertaining to slave morality - is extremely diffuse. Too surely convinced suspicions, strict persecutory belief, blatant victimization: are they a protection or rather the mainstream ways to be Skepticism? Disbelief? Are they science and awareness or facets of another SUPERSTITION? However: What to partake with slaves? Furthermore a true duty for health caring doctors does to have the possibility to promote their deliverance. Who do be "slaves"? What is the Slave morality? Irrational of "mass psychology" or more precisely: allowed sadism? What do I have in common with all this? Without any mystifying call to “eradicate their presumed irrational” a doctor can communicate, exchange information and feelings to can promote a true “liberation” - of whom wishes it. Slave morality? What have I got in common with slaves? But what is a slave? How many facets has the concept – or rather the condition- of being a slave? Slave morality and\or Power morality? Aren’t they the two faces of the same “im-potent” medal, considering Power with a capital P not as ability to do something - as its French-Latin ethimology "potére"="pouvoir" verb and noun - but only as a synonym of imposition if not of abuse over fellow human beings?  WatchThis endeavor will obviously to make known the most of what came on our awareness, but it is basic also to focus on WHO can be the involved people
Crucial advice: never do mix-up differences with similarities.The awareness of information presented and endorsed, quoted sites and publications and names and Institutions come preferably from DIRECT EXPERIENCE and surveys, merely sometimes admitted from others suggestion. Besides on a so tangled field every data should be continually revised: every suggestion must be thanked even if also faced with CAUTION. Therefore in other words does again and again be stated that the aims of this endeavor are NOT to supply data purely for the sake of curiosity, but to AGITATE against the more evil and sinister workings of human cruelty: within lies not only “theory” but “FACTS” and such conflict sometimes becomes not only "theoretical". So it is to be forever stated that this work does NOT be a mere fount of second hand notices but an ENCYCLOPEDIC gather of different original subjects: one another to be read time by time, or better to be CONSULTED even for learning. We hope to can be enough cautious to select only sure ones: but we solicit everyone to send us every comment or - moreover - criticism. To secure this informing aim, the Web site will always be maintained under speedy and diligently revised re-construction, also and perhaps mostly helped by directly received suggestion and/or readers' criticism thanking also erroneous arguments which any way can stimulate to more competently deeming about. The main aim of our work and then of our site is THE MORE to hold and suggest the maximum possible of awareness also with not so common place references. The whole work's aim is primarily to share data and knowledge the most timely and largely: and this purpose is widely obtained by our largest submission of LINKS; but our source not only profits by published scripts and articles: instead sets up the most on FIRST-HAND knowledge of facts as well by direct advice or at least to debate suggestion given by personal interlocutors. But "first hand" does not mean a simple definition: our basic aim is to work with precise PERSONS sincerely witnessing facts or asking for not deceiving PERSONAL help. It is again to say and assume thoroughly that at any case our care prefers to keep away from general questions for going instead on in PERSONAL behalf and that only secondary is the Association's approach to recognize the instruments for harming and the culprits: any way hoping to offer and consolidate this knowledge to the most possible wide extent of people. But a large share of similar damages does not mean that this majority endorses the TRUTH. Similarities do not be flattened into a bunch of carelessly assorted differences: how damaging confusion can mix-up similarities narrow sighted as equalities!All sites and publications, persons and Institutions are endorsed coming from direct advice as well as from alert surveys. But this is a tangled field to be continually revised: each suggestion must be thanked even if also faced often not only WITH RESERVATION, but openly and immediately DISPROVED. (Look in DUBBI e DISCUSSIONE on Testimonianze e dubbi) We don't like "stars" nor "heroes", besides we strongly reject subjective THEORIES usurping the value of precise OBSERVATIONS, as well every invite to simplify and coerce different deeds and different causes into an unified bunch, needlessly assuming very ancient and/or biased Authors quotations to reinforce a personal presumption: Occam's
razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a
principle
attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar , William
of Ockham. The principle states that the
explanation of any
phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating
those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the
explanatory hypothesis or theory. The
principle is often expressed
in Latin
as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of succinctness"):
"entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem", roughly translated
as "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity". An alternative
version "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" translates
"plurality should not be posited without necessity".
... Karl Popper argues that a preference for simple theories need not appeal to practical or aesthetic considerations.
Sleeping reason breeds monsters and monsters? Then it is compelling to WATCH, to WATCH. to WATCH. Ever should be rejected not documented mere asserptions, even together with not enough probed oneself's own feelings. DOUBTS sustaining to MIND and WIDE RANGE AWARENESS must be ever foremost GUIDES.  Cuando los hombres no oyen el grito de la razón, todo se vuelven visiones... but the "alchemic" lynx shouldn't be considered as a sleeper's dreaming "vision": Goya warns us to be on the look-out like the lynx, whose excellent sight sees through the darkness, for when asleep we cannot defend ourselves... (Fantasy DISOWNED by reason breeds impossible monsters? When instead together they mother Arts and source of their portents! Who and how gets fantasy to be DISOWNED by reason? How and when to watch and to protect?)
Statement of meaningThe
main purpose
of this work is to suggest a
series
of questions
rather than
their answers,
and this
carries its fundamental message
of intent. Every attempt to discuss content,
exchanging the
factual dates presented
with
hypothetical “opinions” has
to be refused in an
incontestable
way
by
giving examples of a listing of repeatedly checked and
corrected data, from a caution which presupposes a
lasting
time of
YEARS to
wait till assertions can be justified.
Therefore it
is for the former that a large number of more or less serious –
if
not very serious – euphemistically termed harms, of
which we can be or have been direct or indirect witnesses do not
presented, neither in the book, nor in the site nor in the continuous
updating of the latter.Every
piece of data, always punctiliously
collected and catalogued, waits for further
confirmation,
or is too fateful not to can be openly shared. Any way
the foremost engagement of this whole work is to choose what to
publish, avoiding bare subjective description or - worse - FAKE
misconception. If what is real
is rational has
to be considered as one of our
"passwords" what is proved and documented is real as it is:
then nothing into this work has to be interpreted.Notwithstanding
again and again
the
content of
every reference has to be widely confirmed
by some sure FIRST HAND
supported
testimonies and
documents:
affirmation and suggestion are thoroughly to be checked and
authenticated before share them as "Truth": on the contrary false
accusations can
vilify the knowledge of some really sinful situation
happened not
on Science
Fiction
not as Urban
Legend
hoaxes - as for example methods adopted
and crimes
complied "using" families to be a wicked
ground
for improving Secret
Societies
and fostering new and new accomplices.
Therefore it is
not adequate to read only on a static book: the real relevance of
such lively
- not dogmatic - indications has to be reached and
considered
often confronting the book with the Web site - this leading and the
book only following - continually in touch with
many sources of information,
and so alike continually up-dated. The
true “facts” and the information here collected are not immutable definite
knowledge to be stated
as “theoretical
symbols” but
are
in a constant
state of flux: successive sites and books must
therefore act as reflective witnesses to this ever-changing information. This
site
is
continually in touch with many sources of information,
and so it will
be alike continually up-dated. It endorses into many files relating to
many subjects and FACTS; and it is also well placed on the Search
Engines. Time by time everyone can find the searched
subject
or reach the more cogent subjective problems on picking the
term
in the
main
Search Engines or on going in the site itself to focus,
handle
and open its
real main wealth: the huge lot
of
links.
And on reverse every one can - and this is well
agreed - propose other arguments and/or present
unresolved
problems. Surely
in a field really so tangled every data will be continually revised
with more and more attention: every suggestion must be thanked
even if absolutely faced with reserved CAUTION. Besides the
aims of this site and the
books deriving from it are NOT to supply facts purely for the sake of
curiosity, but to
AGITATE
against evil and sinister workings
of human cruelty and to disclose wicked
obtuseness: within the site and books lie therefore
not only
“theory” but “FACTS” and real - not
abstract - conflict.
Then
unfortunately
also the Web site itself has to
deplore different kinds of damages: being informed that
some files were "burglarized" into not fitting sites, for avoiding
every kind of
interferences and resulting harms every
no more trustful page were taken away and cleaned out from the index.
As
other consequences related
to and COINCIDING with particular
circumstances, site and individual files are mishandled if not
canceled: just the
present file was damaged more than once, also by
more disturbing damages which violate the text itself in a subtle
manner, when to some degree the presumed harmful "deed" impinges the
very meaning of phrases or - worse - of precise links or factual dates
which send to sure synchronizations. Besides
- perhaps
more unfortunately - we find ourselves at times
reluctantly constrained not to
ignore but to fight against the empty
objections
and the... idle
chatter of those who approach these pages believing them to be the
fruit of mere “opinions”;
to stall –
with trouble and also with apprehension
– those who, faced with an “abnormal situation” shoot
haphazardly, without technical preparation and with unprovable
accusations. Recent debates and receipt of new
information gave
the opportunity to refine this file both
in
Italian and in English, but
also
opened the view on a lot of serious causes of
misleading
interpretation which could have risked to cheat the
basics of
the whole Association's
work and purposes. For
this
reason we can
publish only
anomalies
which are truly clearly definable, and not any data and/or testimonial
and/or shared story even if reliable in the long
term. Not only for these motives but for many more
important
warranties our knowledge far exceeds what here
recorded:
only more than a tenth
of the
documentation in our possession has been
- and can be - published. A large number of more or less
serious –
if
not very serious euphemistically termed - “harms”, of
which we can be or have been direct or indirect witnesses, couldn't be
presented, neither in the book, nor in the site or in the continuous
updating of the latter: notwithstanding every piece of data, always
punctiliously
collected and cataloged, waits for further
confirmation.
In some files the
demonstrative pictures are to be considered at
first; but it is
more to be strictly notified that between every one of the described or
depicted facts there was a gap of
years:
look at the exact dates exactly noticed in the web files even if
written after the book published. On the whole site the text is
burdened by a lot of pictures not
ornamental but fitting
to
improve the very content: or better some shared images
often not only point to documents but are as themselves real proofs. Objects
and facts as
witnesses confused with hypothetical
meaning
as symbols? To use certifying words to denote precise
facts of rigorous
proofs or go back to unqualified
terms - such as "levitation" - pertaining as a rule to a
"mystical" vocabulary and so hinting at indemonstrable forces? Here
it is mandatory to explain again the
argument
with a - bitter - consideration: some texts and pictures,
links
and quotations witness
worthful, truthful, documenting deeds;
then for these cases it is urgent to
point out strong and loud against whichever misunderstanding encouraging
to believe that they have a whichever - troublesome - other "meaning",
as
they showed not concrete "facts" since tale-telling words, decorative
illustrations, not expounded symbols...
Our
METHOD is not
to
debate only by
"words", but to document for preference
with FIRST HAND data or even with substantial
"objects" sharing in their shape the very traces of what
happened. These arguments have their highlightening on dedicated and
often
renewed files
"Human
beings" from "targets" to "testimonies",
till even "team
mates"? "Objects"
themselves as "witnesses"?
Expressed
and presented in the typical
terminology of an article
normally to be found in a specialistic journal, the file NUOVISSIME
TECNOLOGIE? ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES?
TECHNOLOGIES AVANCEES? SPITZENTECHNOLOGIEN? and
the
derivative
chapter New
Technologies precise and damaging?dating explanatory
links: in fact only in
this cautious
way can clarification and not obfuscation be made of the origins
and consequences of these “pseudo-anomalous” facts.
Paradigm of the whole system of the site/book it should then be
considered
with
special attention: within it holds
an incontrovertible
document
as regards – and /or maybe at least for the
moment – this ONLY existing proof, in which “mysterious
damage”
to
everyday objects in a normal house
are based only on precise is not only made public but also technically examined. But as the latter also the present file/chapter have questions rather than affermations as their titles; and a series of questions rather than their answers carries their fundamental message of intent: as soon as we receive some answer - no matter if conflicting - we put them on-line. Usually it requires repeatedly checked and corrected technical data, with a firm caution presupposng a waiting time of YEARS before assertions can be justified. The shared selection of photos and CAD's researches on regard of damaged objects try to visually explain the main aim of the whole work: to prepare scientific data for recognizing the efficient cause of these or every other damage. Unfortunately this assumption does as a rule be mistaken and/or mishandled: every attempt to discuss their content, exchanging the factual dates presented with hypothetical “opinions” has to be refused; so it becomes alike pressing to correct and reprove customary not fitting comments regarding the meaning of pictures and first hand texts of the whole site. "Objects" as witnesses as in "Advanced Technologies precise and damaging? "Human beings" from to have been "targets" to become "testimonies" and team-mates? Opinion or accusations? "Accusation" against phantomatic "perpetrators" or "verification" of occurrences and "help" for victims? Real testimonies' terrible flash-backs of their relived past suffering gave the input to organize this whole work: DIRECT witnessing and urgency to care victims became the first purpose from which arose Association and its publications. Opinion or accusation? Opinion, fact, complaint... Even written after It's Abuse NOT Science fiction first edition, a page parallel with this one - even less documented - can be already reached as file on another Web site but also printed as chapter 15 of the derived English book - From children of YESTERDAY to adults of TOMORROW. a site and book regarding children development and further evolutions of humankind. To consider the "human" side of the present topic it is proper to begin from the origin - consolidated by general knowledge on showing preliminary excerpts of scientific teaching references. To found the basics of this whole matter should be straight recognized the numberless ways of the "fourth dimension" of human life: moving from childhood and its obliged passages of development, but later performing along a course leading to every kind of evolutions, surely very plural: not only ever toward Utopian higher-quality directions but also toward more evil human cruelty. On the other hand the personal "fourth dimension" does never considered as ending and never being lost: it continues to exist into an everlasting presence as memory; a function which either succeeds in becoming conscious and meaningful also for settling to health past misfortune, or - not at any time - "repressed" towards "unconscious" so often once more damaging. Talking on regard of such matters, an interlocutor gave us a good opportunity to undermine a possible operational - and then seriously misleading - misunderstanding. On reading emotively the texts on the files/chapters Delgado & Skinner, Totem and Taboo revisited: awful and fertile rise of new superstitions etc. he believed that a precise evil will and purposes are acting whensover to damage the normal children's development and rearing. But UNFORTUNATELY - we repeat: unfortunately - the widespread share of faulty ways to rear children doesn't pertain ever and by itself to a deliberate active program: unfortunately since a wicked demeanor could be struggled on a parallel, adverse open fight. The worldwide parental behavior mirrors instead a NORMAL Gauss curve: at which extremes are - here - the "very good" ones with their good Masters and - there - the wicked ones triggered by evil Masters. But so actually in the large middle of the curve there is a bulk of passive lay-people: selfish, idle, superstitious, adults not really grown, bad lived infancies, people lacking or removing founding experiences. To summarize: persons lacking of INTEGRITY and then - in the proper meaning of the term - castrated of parental instinct. A priority intent of this file/chapter is to remark how faulty too often does mean "being against": notwithstanding - copied and pasted from a foreign newspaper - a page already present on the old version of this book as chapter 16, in this new as chapter 17bis, as well also on another book as chapter 18 - underlines and confirms some of these flash-backs: this paper displays a personal interview sharing a very sharp living portrait of one of a particular worse negative protagonists directly named as enemy on site(s) and books. So Psychocivilization and its discontents lets the interviewed "bad Master" put on his own words his wicked program how to psychocivilize and mind-control the humankind. His assumptions let to confirm some real different deeds: to go on the lot of discoveries gathered on the Association dossiers - and this was a real surprise - let us aware of the SCATTERED diffusion of offensive unexpected tools; what he said and projected is not a boast but actual and effective.The files more open to question need repeatedly changments: it is to say the tangled and potentially duping field of Medical practice, Pharmaceutical factories and experimentations - for example look at mal.htm#statistiche_falsificabili and at superstition.htm#sexual mutilations). Related to this argument - how to change artificially nature and will - is the new add on the file Delgado & Skinner which has been improved with significant references. (Should be watched and broadly shared the You Tube Estimulacion electrica cerebral
en toros (J. Delgado 1964) Video histórico en el que
José
Delgado (1964) torea a un toro con
un electrodo cerebral implantado gestionado mediante control remoto
an
old
registerd interview on
regards of the Bull and
inserted microchip.)
Question marks and exclamation marks… Devices or artificial objects to mistreat and injure people suffering for unusual harms. Among
the experiences that gave
raise to the Association
the potency
and miniaturization achieved by technologies founded on the utilization
of “energies” and their widespread realization resulted unexpected,
even more so the checking of the facility of use and diffusion of tools
derived from them. On
the
other hand elements pell-mell
that cannot be proved, old fashioned data, faulty and not previously
documented memory give rise to abnormal equivocations, when introducing
confused description of instead very real injuries, without specifying the
"hows" and the
contextual "whens".In
fact how both real
weapons
and commercial products of very large and common usableness
turn
out to have been available till long time: but considered without
any wariness, or on the contrary with exaggerate dogmatic
mistrust!
Examples of potentially
useful but, in effect,
unreliable and self-devaluating information abound.
Instead a deliberately collective lack of knowledge laughs at or
mythicizes as
fairy stories the long since realized concrete possibilities supplied
by wave
physics, nanotechnologies
etc.: even cultured people still
think of them as only future possibilities and\or play about with them
as parapsychogical
mysteries, when not defining Science
fiction,
as it can happen even when - seeming almost a subject of a cartoon - a Prosecuting
Attorney
on an
Official Judgment labeled - in the
year 2000! - microchips illegally implanted as:
“belonging
to sci-fi literature”
On this side there is still a majority of non-believers even when confronted by manifest evidence, and a thorough documentation of banal artificial gadgets supply of industrial circulation, producible and commercial through the normal channels of whatsoever products. In effect all this has been more than feasible for many years: such as to allow the production and management of concrete applications that can either deliberately be used as true weapons, or escape control in the hands of the sorcerer’s apprentices. What has this to do with SCIENCE FICTION if now almost every one can use or even build his\her own piece of Star Wars paraphernalia! Just to give an explanatory instance, there are sites of the web for production and sale of improper weapons advertised as cheap ordinary objects, to be furnished with internal links leading to … purchase forms. When everyone can own and use without difficulties every kind of effective uncommon weaponry, every one can own and use terribly performing engines even sold at a very low price pretending to be for not harming uses: for amusement, for chasing rats, for sending away birds...: not only for ... obviously military drills or for harming secretively chosen people. Directed energy weapons as sci-fi hypotheses or even desirable or deprecate future possibilities? What can one do? To can supply for making known very ample and acceptable - all the same precise, concrete, non discursive, founded on studies and research and not only on testimonies – there would be a great step forward in adjourning the professional skills, and as a consequence in protecting us all. Even without overlooking information about more general, indirect also mediatic warnings, either cited as news or confuted for the incongruity of their contents, in analogy with the style and method of this site\book - as shares for example the in-progress updating of the file Segnalazioni di Allarme: Internazionali - links, citations of danger signals, new data drawn preferably from personal experiences and actual facts analysis, first hand documented are and will be published on the web as they arrive. (Look at new introductory quotes of newspaper-data and next ones.) This long and updateable listing of warnings, cited as they are, aims at offering descriptions and advice on how many practical scientific by-products objectified by sophisticated technologies have reached levels of potentiality and feasibility much above a normal, mental, logically acceptable representation. In effect all this has been more than feasible for many years: such as to allow the production and management of concrete applications that can either deliberately be used as true weapons, or escape control in the hands of the sorcerer’s apprentices. Any way this detailed listing, highly partial and not merely illustrative, put forward on the website and in the book, DOES NOT aim at being a request of explicit forbidding, but intends to stigmatize and underline the intrinsic dangerousness of NEW TECHNOLOGIES when employed with overtly injurious intents by expert and determined hands, as well as point out the dangerous effects by irresponsible and amateur hands when using them for banal aim, or even for mere entertainment or silly curiosity.It is not a question of science fiction: on Segnalazioni di Allarme: Internazional a series of anomalies, when not explicit actions aimed at injuring are listed according to situations and international locations. It is essential to know their serious generalized danger either when placed in the hands of ill-intentioned people or even merely in those of sorcerer’s apprentices: at any way succeeding in reaching damages of great effectiveness under underestimated impunity. Quite often these objects of general consumption are sold under the false definition of “harmless” when they not absolutely so: for instance, reliable evidence reports that an outgoing ultrasound frequency, say from 30.000 hz to 65.000 hz with 15 seconds interval emission - is, to say the least, extremely troublesome; more troublesome if not disquieting is the apparently funny Audio Spotlight ...beam
sound to your
listener... and preserve the quiet. Holosonics'
Audio Spotlight®
'Speaks' Directly to Consumers as Part
of Court TV Ad Campaign Directional
Sound System Creates
a "Mystery Whisperer"
to Grab Shopper's Attention
SCIENCE FICTION? Question marks like exclamation marks? Deliberate lack of knowledge - “belonging to sci-fi literature” - etc.? In spite of big impending dangers – not so deceitful after all – several examples send back to sensational disavowals of the fact that already several years ago there was written evidence: without
any doubt that within
five years these
technologies would cause fundamental changes in the way to
operate in firms and in the people’s way of life.
How
is that
possible when anybody can nowadays and since several years use
everywhere and every time cell phones and similar gadgets? Had not Archimedes
invented the method of exhustion with arrays
of mirrors in 200 B.C. in Syracuse
against the fleet of the Roman
invaders?
A cogent example of a big dangerous confusion: "Non-lethal" Weapons? Micro-waves or simply white phosphorus?Micro-wave
technology has been around for years
and it is well known that it can be deadly if focused into a beam. Has
it already been
used? Ask
yourself:
How
does one burn a body beyond recognition and leave the clothing intact
and not even
singed?
If
this is the result of some new microwave technology, is it really
non-lethal, or can it
be used in some other non-disclosed application?
With
the maximum of
caution we
ever choose only
documents probing FACTS,
avoiding the more every not already published sure interpretation
regarding causes or - worse - reponsabilities. So just at
present when
this matter has been highlighted
by media we
publish this notice
regarding the - well known and from longtime USED - white
phosphorus. Ci
scusiamo se
qualcuno
ha creduto poterci confondere con chi, in altra sede e ben diversamente
da noi, ha attribuito la causa
di questo "strano" fenomeno a
ipotetiche "nuove"
tecnologie
The recent stories from CNN and the Air Force Times reveal a "new" weapon to be used by our military We aknowledge the readers if maybe one could have confused us with other sites where - and with Authors who - in an irresponsible way, as this shared in the thereunder quotation, dare to impute hypothetical responsibility on claiming the fault of an - hypothetical - "new" technology, instead to evidence only the fact itself. Micro-wave
technology has been around for years
and it is well known that it can be deadly if focused into a beam. Has
it already been
used? Ask
yourself:
How does one burn a body beyond recognition and leave the clothing intact and not even singed? If this is the result of some new microwave technology, is it really non-lethal, or can it be used in some other non-disclosed application? Instead
when an official
statement
notifies
White
phosphorus
is not banned
by any
treaty to which the United States
is a signatory. Smokes and obscurants comprise a category of materials
that are not used militarily as direct chemical agents. The United
States retains its ability to employ incendiaries to hold high-priority
military targets at risk in a manner consistent with the principle of
proportionality that governs the use of all weapons under existing law.
The use of
white
phosphorus or fuel air explosives are not prohibited
or restricted by Protocol II of the Certain Conventional Weapons
Convention (CCWC), the Convention on Prohibitions or
Restrictions on
the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons which may be Deemed to be
Excessively Injurious or to have Indiscriminate Effects.
On
the contrary
should
straightforwardly denied every
confusion with
those
who impute every odd phenomenon to hypothetical new
technologies not in order to establish facts, but to
supply evidence to their own ideas by hypothetical accusations, enticing secondary incredulity
leading to minimize if
not to ridicule even reliable information. Our
usual
endeavor does NO OPT for
designate target: to search and share a sure present or past COMPLETE
TRUTH is
an aim too much
pretentious, an aim leading to preconceived notions. The effectual aim
is rather focused to find and hold the most large
amount of knowledge to be widespread
and wide used. Dynamic
an d
precise and opportune awareness should be enabled by continual basic
adds and conceptual
revision:
far from a so often
almost
mainstream
exaggerate dogmatic mistrust
and
confusion. An
offer which means to watch over dangers and if possible to denounce
openly dangerous people regards only a better potential protection, not
- as STATED - supposed ideological accuses.
We
acknowledge the readers if maybe one could have confused
us with sites where and with Authors who - in
an
irresponsible way
dare
to
impute hypothetical responsibility
on
claiming the fault of a - hypothetical - "new" technology, instead
to evidence only
the
fact itself. Mostly
when such a position is
made public and
displayed with arrogance violently denouncing for example electromagnetic
weapons as "special
cause of all possible iniquities".With
the maximum of caution we
ever choose only
documents probing FACTS,
avoiding the more every not already published sure interpretation
regarding causes or - worse - responsabilities. That
is why for instance – warranted by a piece of news appeared
on the media
in an official declaration - see the below quotation
- we can point out for example as a cause of dangerous
misunderstandings the "material"
which
has been long known and USED as white
phosphorus,
confused with "energy"
weapons.
Recent
data - 2009:
Gaza burn
victims
exhibit possible signs of white phosphorous wounds
By Amira
Hass
GAZA - Palestinian doctors at a number of hospitals in the Gaza Strip informed foreign medical experts allowed into the area over the past two weeks that they were witnessing an unexpected deterioration in the condition of their burn victims. They described the same phenomenon: Two weeks after being injured, the burn victims seemed to be getting worse, requiring skin grafts abroad. In other instances, internal tissue was also destroyed. "When the phosphorus comes in contact with living tissue it causes its damage by 'eating' away at it. Characteristics of a phosphorus wound are: chemical burns accompanied by extreme pain, damage to tissue ... the phosphorus may seep into the body and damage internal organs. In the long run, kidney failure and the spread of infection are characteristic ... In conclusion: a wound by an ordinance containing explosive phosphorus is inherently dangerous and has the potential to cause serious damage to tissue." A document entitled "Exposure to White Phosphorus," prepared by Medical Field Operations HQ and sent from the Health Ministry notes that "most of the data on phosphorus wounds stems from animal testing and accidents. Exposure to white phosphorus is highly poisonous, according to many lab experiments. Burns covering a small area of the body, 12-15 percent in lab animals and less than 10 percent in humans, may be lethal as a result of its effects, mostly on the liver, heart and kidneys." Related articles: Rights group: IDF using white phosphorous bombs in attacks on Gaza Human Rights Watch: Israel using white phosphorus munitions in Gaza Gazans say IDF troops ignored white flags and shot at them Old
data: videos
and/or site of RaiNews24/Inchieste
can however ever
timely inform by their so exact references and mostly inquiries.
Micro-wave
technology has been around for years
and it is well known that it can be deadly if focused into a beam. Has
it already been
used? Ask
yourself:
How
does one burn a body beyond recognition and leave the clothing intact
and not even
singed? If
this is the result of some new microwave technology, is it really
non-lethal, or can it
be used in some other non-disclosed application? Non-lethal Energy Weapons? (Quotation
from articles of
March 2001)
Micro-wave
technology is well known that it can be deadly if focused into a beam
(?)
.... How does one burn a body beyond recognition and leave the clothing intact and not even singed? Look at photos: links 1 e 2 (Gulf War) [How???: using white phosphorus - nicknamed by soldiers: Willi Pete.] Explanation and purposes: "slavery"
 Slave morality? What have I got in common with slaves? What have I in common with? First of all, doctors in common have the possibility to favour their liberation.
A testimony on the other face of the Power that can entice so many. This kind of Power is enormously costly: the cost of life and freedom for yourself and your family. For, once you accept to become part of this world, of these organizations, the price to pay is: Explanation
and purposes: "development towards evil and worsened evil".
Not always to describe development and evolutionary patterns of humankind hints towards agreeable matters, in fact "human evolutive patterns" can also advance towards evil and worsened evil: then so also ogres exist and not only as fairy tales characters. So it is compelling to think not only about "support" and "direction" as meaning of the arrow on the Italian title page of the below quoted bilingual site and Italian book - Bambini di IERI=adulti di oggi.Adulti di oggi->adulti di DOMANI - but also to recognize and to eventually oppose its bad side as possible third shared message: "against". Obviously here one can touch distressing subjects so open to question: just for such so important matter this bitter controversial file/chapter is presented in both languages and on two sites and books: the titles themselves: Opinioni, fatti, accuse? and Opinion, fact, complaint and controversia - as well as this one Opinion or accusation? and method - specifies that the real design and aims does be to refute any risk of misuse. Castrated of parental instinct? Developmental advances or passive dependency? Such argument is largely deployed on the only Italian file of another site and related book chapter 3, Imbroglio è il contrario di sviluppo, the more by the quote accompanying and explaining the title - To coil/embroil reflects to involve: it is to say the contrary of to develop - but here one can enlist and consolidate some of its - there only implicit - meanings, to begin from assumptions basic and then more at risk to mislead towards a worse series of consecutive misunderstanding. Studying the history of brutality and “special” criminals of past times could enable us to better understand those of the present: but it is surely easier to stun the masses with abhorrence and commotion, with gossip, impromptu supposition, tabloid journalism. This sensationalism which ignores history involves itself in the ephemeral present, favouring and “packaging” every time they happen shocking new stories in order to feed the collective “pseudo-caring” - or better sadism - of the masses. It is too easy and so almost commonplace a strong sense of CONTRO/AGAINST "guilty" rather than a paying of attention to “victims”; “against” being an exaggeration - which takes in the naïve - of current events and so straightforward to be soon forgotten and replaced by others. Then implying to better precise these quotes on behalf of required answers owing to current controversies - giving thus the name of the parallel file of another site: controversia.htm. We wish also to make reference to the simpler title given on the same subject on this site: Opinions or accusations? drawing attention to the URL /method_engl.htm indicating clearly the methodology used - not elitist, not exclusive but general and concrete. Our endeavor does NO OPT for designate target: it is more than sure that to search and share a sure TRUTH is an aim too much pretentious and so our endeavor doesn't be on behalf of such a source of preconceived notion. But this means also that it rather should find and hold the most large amount of knowledge to be widespread and wide used: an offer which means notwithstanding a better potential ways to "thrive" or at least to unblock more functionl ways of protection. Although a source of even terrible risks is to mistake the real knowledge of REAL FACTS, to mislead inner body's occurences and feelings switching towards believed dynamics as coming from external world: however the foremost engagement of this whole work is never to choose; but if for us is mandatory either to avoid bare subjective description or - worse - to accept impressive misconception drawing to hoax, also our directive is never to be surprised and denying every circumstance. Real is rational: even if not always what seems "rational" does be real. Then why and how here this quote? Which place has here this most famed excerpt from Hegel's reference? The place of a "password": what can be observed, proved and documented is real AS IT IS and therefore it has not to be interpreted.
But if as a rule this sentence sounds right, such a proposal should NOT be accepted when more or less unfair "opinions" are displayed, instead of DOCUMENTS and real DEEDS having their factual place. This file/chapter - as well the parallel file Opinioni, fatti, accuse / Opinion, fact, complaint - tries to explain the meaning to openly have shared this "lack of tolerance". In fact the knowledge of this file/chapter completes the whole site/book - It's Abuse NOT Science fiction - and also is worthy to precise Opinioni, fatti, accuse and Opinion, fact, complaint present on another book as chapter 15. On both books chapters shared examples, quotations - and more... - are to be considered a better support to understand the real meaning of the whole underlying proposal. The different naming of URLs explains and settles and integrates the utter purpose of both files and sites/books: controversia alludes to content and occasion, method furthermore on reporting also additional politic topics establishes argumenting patterns of way to work. Therefore if this work doesn't be a static gather of documentation and description, it requests to develop its knowledge by other people's asks and doubts and testimony: so it can become an open windows on largest scenarios, in a continually in progress communication based more on observed changing sight of FACTS than on an interchange of WORDS. So this means to wish a serious and profitable support of sure, authenticated, scientifically probed shared knowledge, but it is necessary to add again an explanatory codicil here to highlight the fundamental principles which underlie the approach to this work, in order to avoid at the outset not criticism – which is welcomed! – but misunderstandings and ambiguities. Any way even if these basics are founded on a philosophic upbringing, the background of this work pertains to and comes from a very factual field: its aim is less to explain, to propose, to point out but the more to act when possible to protect and to care, to build and rebuild: surely NOT to accuse. This not in the name of a something as a "charitable goodness": as much as for a real critical attention to consider PROPORTION at disposal of the means and their - presumed - outcomes, of the presumed causes and the presumed consequences. This is also persistently and repeatedly brought to readers attention in every other file/chapter; it lends itself being presented as typical of the main point of view, or better still the methodological approach on which this work is realized. Its primary aim is not to discuss presumed opinions in ideological way, nor MUCH LESS to throw out at random hypothetical accusations: but rather to work in such a way that each assertion could be constituted as a document able to be corroborated and enhanced. Utterly only a document itself, which can clearly signal factual data could develop into information fruitful for further, better observations, as well for further doubts and for further searches. In this way it becomes an “open window” not to offer explanations but merely DESCRIPTIONS, documented and elucidated in iconographic and incontrovertible way, since also confirmed by checkable renewed sources and authoritative even - or better: for preference - first hand data. Well-documented
historical events resemble terrible facts of the
present: for example that of the 15th century Gilles de Rais
and the hundreds of children raped and killed by him alongside the
troops he chose and supplied to Joan
of Arc. But instead how easy it is to be CONTRO on the
immdiate! How easy to focus on every single case in an exclusive and sensationalist
manner, creating an almost fairy-tale villain of the presumed guilty!
How many successive Bluebeards
have there been, committing absolutely similar crimes, yet – and here
they differ from Gilles de Rais e Dutroux
- in full impunity? And on the contrary how many, maybe innocent, have
been charged
with witchcraft, put to death or, more currently been monsters
making
headline news in unredeemable ways? While how many
other authentic “monsters” live and have lived – well and long – quiet
and honoured lives?
The most banal solutions are put forward by confused and ill-informed interviewers and appeals to generic better feelings (!!!) do not so much hush the deafening silence as revive and give incentive to the repressed sadistic instinct to express itself through the lynchmob – perhaps not always ideological. Choices of the facile and populist road, important reports made public in a slipshod and imprecise way, risk the nullifying of the otherwise serious and difficult process of documentation , of testing evidence; thus seriously damaging time and time again the actual victim. There is no need to believe in finding in every case (pseudo) heroes to whom evil submits and has been submitted to, or who pit themselves against evil; interior lack of well-being together with a sense of widespread injustice makes a collective risk of a feeling of inferiority/dependence a reality. In response to such feelings grows the desire to seek for absolutes – in which to believe and guides on which to rely on. The and the trust in a guide becomes absolutes are however unilateral exclusive and excluding with the inevitable malevolence and discord. The - presumed – good citizens face each other on either side of opposing views instead of collaborating; and it is in this climate of confusion that the slave morality tends to prevail, with the taking up of hostile positions if not “appeals” to lynch the presumed guilty instead of supporting and listening to the real victim with precise witness and solidarity. Experience – gradual over the years and of clinical concreteness – in the field of “reliving” previous childhood trauma started the Associazione and remains today as foundation of an important part of its work. However this interest has had to take on a wider aspect in as much as it has found itself faced with numerous other testimonies – internationally – from adults who are suddenly afflicted with suffering: unexpected and “strange” as those who have undergone unusual abuses. Here it has found itself ascertaining and verifying how – on a planetary scale. now as in the past – the abuse of children is part of the infinite mass of well differentiated abuse of every genre carried out between human beings – mental abuse, physical (and sexual) and also economical and technological. . Studying the history of brutality and “special” criminals of past times could enable us to better understand those of the present: but is it not easier instead to stun the masses with abhorrence and commotion, with gossip, impromptu supposition, tabloid journalism? This sensationalism which ignores history involves itself in the ephemeral present, favouring and “packaging” every time they happen shocking news stories in order to feed the collective “pseudo-caring” - or better sadism - of the masses. Why and how REAL IS RATIONAL? Why here this quote? Which place has here the mot famed excerpt from Hegel's reference? The place of a "password": what can be observed, proved and documented is real AS IT IS and therefore it has not to be interpreted. In fact not always to describe children' life hints towards agreeable matters: in fact ogres exist and not only as fairy tales characters. So it is compelling to think not only about "support" and "direction" of the arrow on the title page, but also to recognize - to can fight - the "against" bad side. Obviously here one can touch distressing subjects so open to question: just for such so important matter this bitter controversial file/chapter is presented in both languages and on two sites and books: the titles themselves: Opinioni, fatti, accuse and Opinion, fact, complaint and controversia - as well as method - specifies that the real design and aims does be to refute any risk of misunderstanding. The risk is to sliding into a culture of resentment: Such
logic leds to
the creation of a culture
of
resentment,
whose
only
solution was to do away with the "other". The
fact is, the culture of resentment –
pertaining to slave morality
- is extremely diffuse. It is in the air everywhere, without being
theorised. It grows and feeds on itself by the forces of inertia – it
has no need of advertising or publicity.
As
another
"password"
Sleeping reason breeding monsters accompanies many files
in this
site and
the slightly
modified world-famous Goya's
table gives
impact to the
cover of
the book It's Abuse
NOT Science
fiction, and as well another phrase what do I
have in
common with slaves, often cited in this site, stays at the
base of the principal proposals of our
research.
But like to
resolve a
pronounced amnesia
not
only the
unsaid should be unveiled but furthermore also bare words as
themselves should be
too often rejected: to know and discern how the false can hide
underneath. Thus to be a victim
is
not
an indubitable certificate of merit: to be or to have been a victim
does not mean a personal characteristic of someone but merely
that to this someone have happened or are happening damaging things.
Unfortunately if to be or to have been “victims” does not
mean to
be heroes,
even
more “unfortunately” to be “heroes” does not
automatically indicate integrity: on the contrary victims and heroes
are often categories in which “slaves” typically are placed, those who
- however they are – confuse the internal with the external, who live
and believe to live within a system that does not stem from themselves
but comes from the other/others: a people not only seeking dependence,
but approval,
consideration, admiration, seduction, dogma, belonging to, guide,
prescription, predominance till seeing all this thereafter to switch on
offense and PERSECUTION.
 With almost embarrassment and fear of
being taken as “negationists”, or
as followers of Nietzsche or - very worse - Spengler we have cited
the above
aphorism
about the outpouring of polemic and argument directed also at victims
as well at their true or false helpers or defenders. It is
instead our conviction that “slave morality” and “superman” are two
sides of the same coin and of the same category, like that
of
the masses
and the "refined minds". The emotional
flattening of servile condescension and admiring
exaltation or execration are two moments of the same... neurosis if not
psychosis or of the same perversion... But even if highs and lows of
myth-making and intense sentimentalism only take place occasionally it
is ALWAYS
SADISM and can produce or permit disastrous consequences.
Without
fear of offending anyone,
as soon as new data or new answers make necessary adds this file
continues to show
our disassociation and opposition
to all the clamor of hypothetical attribution and of “looking for
monsters”, and stands against the sea of conspiracy
theorists
– in
good or bad faith – without importance as to whether it is formed of
victims or of intriguers. "Neurosis", "perversions", "psychosis": we are not afraid to use these terms that – we repeat UNFORTUNATELY – are not accepted by many of those who suffer from them. It is not a question of “eradicating the irrationality of the masses” as asserted in a bizarre statement discussed heatedly elsewhere, but to understand that if there has not been a TRUE development from infancy to adulthood – in all its subsequent stages – then one endangers to believe in a artificial if not fraudulent recovery of the lost phases: mostly to divert on admiring ideas of “something” much more “grandiose”. To belong on a group, to follow preconceptions, common ideas, dogma, certainties of every genre, to long for serenity at any cost or disownment, to be keen of the idea of superman or the super-criminal on which one places ones' existential emptiness…: all this is not “irrationality” but symptoms of illness, either personal or - to be realistic - even more precisely sociological. The - presumed – good citizens face each other on either side of opposing views instead of collaborating; and it is in this climate of confusion that the slave morality tends to prevail, with the taking up of hostile positions if not “appeals” to lynch the presumed guilty instead of supporting and listening to the real victim with precise witness and solidarity. Experience – gradual over the years and of clinical concreteness – in the field of “reliving” previous childhood trauma started the Associazione and remains today as foundation of an important part of its work. Here it has found itself ascertaining and verifying how – on a planetary scale. now as in the past – the abuse of children is part of the infinite mass of well differentiated abuse of every genre carried out between human beings – mental abuse, physical (and sexual) and also economical and technological. Titles do not prevail to CONTENT In
fact not in a
personal private form rather - then: worse
unfortunatly - more
often the most banal
solutions are put forward by confused and ill-informed interviewers;
appeals to generic "good feelings" (!!!) do not so much hush the
deafening silence as instead unfold and give incentive to the repressed
sadistic instinct: expressing itself through the
lynch-mob –
perhaps not
always merely ideological. Choices of the facile and populist road,
important reports made public in a slipshod and imprecise way etc. risk
the nullifying of the otherwise serious and difficult process of
documentation, of testing evidence: thus seriously damaging again and
again the actual victim.
There is no need to believe in (pseudo) heroes struggling against evil: on the contrary an interior lack of well-being, together with a sense of widespread injustice, makes the risk to increase and validate feelings of inferiority/dependence as a fixed reality. But it is in response to such feelings that grows the desire to seek for absolutes – in which to believe in - and guides on which to rely on. The absolutes are however unilateral and the trust in a guide becomes exclusive and excluding with the inevitable malevolence and discord. The - presumed – good citizens face each other on either side of opposing views instead of collaborating; and it is in this climate of confusion that the slave morality tends to prevail, with the taking up of hostile positions if not “appeals” to lynch the presumed guilty less difficult than to support and listen the real victims with precise witness and solidarity. This proposal should not undervalue and discard who wherever and at any age suffers for inexplicable "disorders". It is not necessary any accord to the banal parameters of a banal “culture of slavery”: just a real experience – gradual over the years and of clinical concreteness – in the field of “reliving” previous childhood trauma, started this site and task built to offer an address to whom seek for a better - neither mainstream nor "counter information" - knowledge, but also for finding a place where confirm and validate and exchange "strange experiences". But this knowledge resulted in a wider and wider aspects facing with numerous other international testimonies: not only by to relive past childhood harms and undergone unusual abuses, but also by adults suddenly afflicted with suffering unexpected and absolutely not customary. Ascertained and verified on a planetary scale, now as in the past, the abuse of children revealed to be part of an infinite mass of differentiated abuse of every genre – mental abuse, physical (and sexual) and also economical and technological - carried out on human beings by other wicked human beings; a lot of odd evil actions maybe on return financed (?) by the “business” of films using minors with an unheard sexual as much as also not only sexual cruelty and violence. Resulting problems and responsibilities are therefore enormous: they require a secure connection and a solid and effective collaboration amongst those diverse realities, favoring everywhere and in whatever way the exchange of different experiences above all based on the impartial and un-programmed hearing of victims of every age, on the accurately selected credibility of each one: of each child now, but also of whoever, for however many years after, manifests through reliving the then “violated child”. Actual children, grown-up reliving their abused childhood, adults suffering for very "mysterious" harms become so allowed to heal from violation conserved within the interior, like a “cancer” which should have continued to impede the person from living a normal life: then so allowed to speak they can develop into faithful witness on regard of those experiences, no more at risk to be mistaken as mere "delusions". Unfortunately there is again and again the strong sense of CONTRO/ AGAINST "guilty" rather than real care of “victims”, whilst it is so far easy to appeal to impromptu, immediate “higher sentiments” in favor of a single “victim” or to refer to single and contingent “monsters” in order to hit the headlines. In a cascade of worsening, caution and doubts are coursed for encouraging discord and disorganization amongst those who seek or believe to act in good faith. But this carries on more and more worse consequences: at first instigating and fostering paranoid fantasies in the victims themselves locks them in a vicious circle where the reliability as witness questioned becomes make faithless. But vicious circles don't stop: screaming “higher sentiments” and/or appeals against "monsters" allure to protagonism a lot of idle people victims of very scanty damages or willing to appear as "heroic helper", if not a lot of fake victims when even of disguised perpetrators. To consider also that who wishes to join victims and their – also presumed and so-calling - defenders are often only exhibitionists seeking attention by calling public with clamorous appeals; but ever these clamorous campaigns, time after time demonizing single event and single nations, tend to forget them soon after and substituting with others. In fact working too often and too many in this field are those who propose and agitate along one single line of thought: taking up positions and “appeals” they are proud to incite the “lynching” of the presumed guilty, instead of giving solidarity and sustenance to the real victims: then victims real or fake or real or fake helpers and accusers considering from one aspect only the facts relevant to themselves, clash and thus unload their tensions in petty vindications. For example many “authoritative experts” consider in exclusivity only one restricted sector: in the combating of paedophilia, only one aspect of sexuality involving minors; other "defenders" who opposes the more generalized abuse of innocent citizens as “guinea pigs” don't recognize who tries to act against believed colluders of "bad medicine" or against “weapons of energy”. In sum up whoever wish to work in these important fields risks to finds himself branching off in a mass of separate groupings: in addition tending to confuse science, technology and the bad use of these with subjective conclusions passed off as absolutes. Individual groups acting more or less in good faith attack with disparaging campaigns the “competitors” and with appeals to the “cleansing of public conscience” promote – uselessly? – requests for signatures for eventual – and in their turn criminal – proposals for laws promoting "to geld" etc. In place of a serious and patient search for the truth and real PROTECTION of the victims, damage on damage, cruelty on cruelty widen more and more the wild circle of wickedness. Hoew easy is to prefer fatuous, ephemeral, gossipy, demonstrative susceptibilities and/or resentment to hinder real, deep, responsible INDIGNATION!
|
|
Perhaps
it is a universal truth that the loss
of
liberty at
home
is to be charged to
provisions against danger, real or pretended, from abroad.
The
greatest dangers
to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal,
well
meaning but without
understanding.
Justice
Louis
Brandeis,
1928
|
We would eagerly keep a strict distance from counter information, alternative cultures and from pseudo-accusers, from groups which - through gross ignorance of High Politics, and/or worse through grosser ignorance of Highest Finance – build hypotheses, basically mythical “certainties” inherent with pseudo–sure reasons about the guilty “perpetrators” of their trouble. To simply ridicule as laughable narrow-minded's self-sufficiency is not a logical way to think or to do: mean persons often try "to promote" themselves taking a - selfish - advantage from personal mishaps, laying the blame on presumed "assured" knowledge of Affairs of State. Any way these pseudo-sure "knowledge" - the more if selfish, poor and constrained and fixed and unilateral - drags behind shared assumptions of great world plots, conspiracy theories set up by “perpetrators” who they consider not only generically hostile and malign but also a direct cause of their suffering. Not only do we keep our distance but we are above all in direct cause of their own private open opposition to anything which cannot be factually proved: in particular if this causes sect-like ideological groupings. Any grouping exclusively focussed on fighting a “common enemy” is basically structured like a sect, meaning like a non-homogenous entity united exclusively to incorporate individuals and entities coming from very different situations.They are united not through any sense of real cooperating community but by a blind hostility. United because they are only against a common enemy: real or more or less hypothetical but however characterised to be beyond any effective opposition other than symbolic action.
Titles should prevail over the content? Should the not yet known be mislead with "Occult" as opposite of “cultured”? Should what is considered by mainstream culture as "odd" be mistaken with parapsychological knowing or Devilish mystery - "D" capital - or coming from UFOs? The Association, website and book, define themselves as actively “against mental abuse” as well as against “physical and technological”: it is worthy to take this opportunity to stigmatise the possibility of PROPAGANDA, or the diffusion, also involuntarily, of disinformation via a mental mechanism to superficialize knowledge of the ways in which titles and sentimental yells manage to prevail over descriptive content, in which occasional emotionalism over working learning. More generally, called to give evidence, we have to answer with a dry series of comments or better have to ask everyone and ourselves a series of questions - rhetorical because we already know the possible answers. For many years now strident, flag-waving repetitive and resonant copies of testimonials of suffering victims have circulated - even if at times denied – and the victims regroup in Associations and Discussion Forums: but over-numerous to be all faithful and too often litigious to be efficient. One asks what is the geo-political provenance of this cultural mass, willing to transmit alarms: does unfortunately be an hidden decoy deviating attention towards an unequivocal enemy a series of things rendered as unrecognisable collusions? In the hands of the wizards of communication - like the worst political machination of the whole series of “pseudo-certainties”, “pseudo-causalities” – stand fake certainties if not the absolute attribution of “guilt”. Screaming propaganda indicates Nations, populations, organisations etc. as the indiscutable sites of absolute evil: does one not instead ask why and how only this news circulates? Is there an underlying real reason or is it not more simply and logically because in some countries rather than others EXISTS still(?) a RELATIVE freedom of speech and of the press? CIA as the bogeyman for children, Belgium as a corrupt nation home to wicked paedophile murderers; Scandinavia as the place where one is tortured from birth? Does no-one ask if it is logical that the rest of the world is a kind of Paradise? Does one really ask what happens and has happened? Is it not that Americans, Scandinavians, Belgians have still (?) a certain freedom of speech and of the press? What do the direct witnesses say with documents, photos, surveys of place etc.? What is revealed?
Sided by the introductory file/chapter Presentazione e indice ragionato: come cominciare / Preamble: how to begin this file\chapter presents the preliminaries of a study and research METHOD aiming at concrete actions and moreover at a precise disavowal to not being confused our work wirh unconvincing, "simple" chatty rumors. Some Authors and some books - namely: the best seller writer David Icke - "tell" - in fact "tell" as being "novels" - some excerpts of serious deeds, presented on a fair style - indeed "novel-like"! - which mixes reality and fantasy in an apparent not-fiction, or worse: spreading on purpose some truth and some damaging data promoting a lot of fake-assured misinterpretations.
Chicken
or
eggs? Which is the first
problem?
Or
better: has to be
preminent the will to persecute the
culprit instead to consider his victim? Or then: will the victims be
harmed again and again?
...victims
(lay
people) have a tendency to forget about the
patient (very often a victim) and to concentrate on the source
of evil
(whatever it is in our beliefs).
Such
irresponsible words
express very clearly one of the utter
difficulty to prevent damages and harms, to care and to promote a real
justice: in sum up to can positively help real suffering people, to
ascertain true ones from fake plaintive of worse from wolves in sheep’s clothing
- and/or
to positevely act in real behalf of whom is really needing help.
On the contrary, thoroughly prepared from decades, the purposes of book(s), site(s) and related researches at present can broadly share a deep awareness by actual present observations, but also coming from more or less easy or painful testimonies of past times and occurrences. Besides to consider that just from painful memories also arises a concrete possibility to open a new general understanding: a knowledge giving the possibility, beyond the real practicability to care and mend, also to protect, and even - if convenient - to officially denounce but surely only when well prepared by getting facts, matters, situations on an assured KNOWLEDGE. Any way this whole work has the task to document but else to learn by matching asks: both previous awareness and other people's assumption and doubts can open towards a serious and profitable exchange of sure, authenticated, scientifically worthly to be probed intelligence. Of course from "external world" some real damages occur: but to fight them "bare hands" is a very disproportionate struggle, disproportionate even if not surely defeating. In fact the indispensable and ever lasting and ever prepared to WATCH has continually to protect for avoiding against unfortunately COMMON traps: not inconsistent but very serious since pushing to engage in inadequate conflicts not considering proportion between - real or presumed - forces and effects. In fact a source of even terrible risks does to mistake hoaxes with the real knowledge of REAL FACTS, as well to mislead inner body's occurrences and feelings switched towards believed dynamics coming from external world.
Thus not only should stop to describe every not enough precise and specified data: on the contrary it is mandatory to avoid every inference regarding not well supported occurrences, every boasting battles against too much "high" High Powers as against a wide "common sense", against unknowable, hidden enemies as against the unawareness of lay-people. Such a fight can put forward with some hope to succeed merely if pointing out and warning against them in a way the most precise, seriously studied, accurate defined: yet AVOIDING bare words or pitiful moaning one can fight on an acceptable level. To recognize the reality of "human external world", its connections, oppositions, changeable alliances is difficult even for inside trained people: how awful consequences could bring about to misunderstand facts with "opinions" and "feelings", and the "master way" to confuse "friends" with "enemies" and vice versa! How much fallacious is the forthcoming when deceptive naivety or obtuseness assure to be aware of who are the culprits and their plans to act! How is deceitful to "cry wolf" without giving any "how", "when" and "where"! Unfortunately we find ourselves at times reluctantly constrained not to ignore but to fight against empty objections and ... idle chatter of those who approach these pages believing them to be the fruit of mere “opinions”! How to warn – with trouble and also with apprehension – those who, faced with “abnormal situations” shoot haphazardly without preparation and with unprovable accusations. It is for this reason that we WILL publish only anomalies and memories which are truly clearly definable, and not any data and/or testimonial and/or shared story even if reliable in the long term. Any grouping exclusively focussed on fighting a “common enemy” is basically structured like a sect, meaning like a non-homogenous entity united exclusively to incorporate individuals and entities with very different situations united not through any sense of real cooperating community but by a blind hostility towards a homogenous enemy. United because they are against a common target: real or more or less hypothetical but however characterized to be beyond any effective opposition other than symbolic action.
Of “vital” importance? Naivety falling into superstitious gullibility and so open to foster “sect-like” organizations? Or even "derelict" prsons ready to be involved in "Cult-like" groups?
Sects or similar “cliques” offer support and consolation to frail people in search of a pseudo “happiness”, to sick people who aspires to the indifference of a confined “serenity”: not for nothing Delgado himself wrote a book entitled La Felicidad, rather than only express his ferocious principles in his research into a Psychocivilized Society. Or else they welcome and “console” the more desperate victims mourning over their fate. Real mishaps or real and documented suffering are so collectively and indiscriminately given at general attention: not as proper afflictions but as ACCUSATIONS against the hypothetical common perpetrators. From this step where can we arrive: see The first humanitarian war in history: Hitler and the Sudetenlanders. Hitler and Sudetenlanders? A postponed terrible World War? One more year as gift to advantage Nazism? (Definitely any subject alluding to conspiracy, international plots, secret history and underground politics allures a morbid fascination for a lot of naive or aggressive or blatant people. Merely on searching books or videos checking these words an hotchpotch of assorted titles floods: even a lot of titles - near hundred! - not only racist but considering Hitler himself in various strange connection with Anglo-American powers.)
When private individual "victims" complain for haphazard harms to be held and consoled, how harmful results such customary confusion! little querulous people's private lamentation being maximized with the sure consequence of a minimization of the biggest collective happening and collective crimes as slaughters, lagers, wars! Of vital importance? How damaging can similar heterogeneous groups become also towards their own members! How many lay themselves open to the sneaking in of the true persecutors – the “wolves in sheep's clothing” – sects, cults, gangs, agents provocateurs, false victims, true - and just for this really sick and badly suffering - mads …: in every case real danger and certainly discredit! To act without knowledge of causes and with crass sermonizing, in disdainful ignorance, to engage oneself against hypothetical and elusive “enemies” instead of alleviate and/or avoid the real suffering and damage?
The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding... Don't be men of zeal without understanding almost a clinical definition of paranoia? After all not only true delusional mads can endanger, every intimate psychic disorder as a good fostering ground of vulnerability enacts against the whole public wellbeing.
<Neurosis absorbs anguish as a sponge.It is convenient, it gets as a mighty mummy. Even mild Neurosis as personal, intimate disorder affects private freedom and impairs individual concentration and attention; but - as told in this Italian writing it gets as a sponge helping to absorb anguish... Neurosis itself is personal but affects a great deal of people, and then, when collective, this lessened existence could become everywhere a fertile ground fitting to foster superstitions: taboo as are duping prohibitions, but also compelling orders with even more RAGE and CRAZE.
So, often with inconsistent reason, whichever impromptu sharing a "neurotic concern" can become widespread; but also whoever tricky arrogant can enter in this so open pathway towards an indirect mind-control. Imposed as a new Totem, every bogus fear thus at first menaces proclaiming - hypothetic - forthcoming damages, and then offers pseudo-guarantees if the "mind-controlled" people follows so established hoaxes or even so accepted swindles.
On the contrary, thoroughly prepared from decades, the purposes of book(s), site(s) and related researches at present can broadly share a deep awareness by actual present observations, but also coming from more or less easy or painful testimonies of past times and occurrences. Besides to consider that just from painful memories also arises a concrete possibility to open a new general understanding: a knowledge giving the possibility, beyond the real practicability to care and mend, also to protect, and even - if convenient - to officially denounce but surely only when well prepared by getting facts, matters, situations on an assured KNOWLEDGE. Any way this whole work has the task to document but else to learn by matching asks: both previous awareness and other people's assumption and doubts can open towards a serious and profitable exchange of sure, authenticated, scientifically worthly to be probed intelligence. Of course from "external world" some real damages occur: but to fight them "bare hands" is a very disproportionate struggle, disproportionate even if not surely defeating. In fact the indispensable and ever lasting and ever prepared to WATCH has continually to protect for avoiding against unfortunately COMMON traps: not inconsistent but very serious since pushing to engage in inadequate conflicts not considering proportion between - real or presumed - forces and effects. In fact a source of even terrible risks does to mistake hoaxes with the real knowledge of REAL FACTS, as well to mislead inner body's occurrences and feelings switched towards believed dynamics coming from external world.
Thus not only should stop to describe every not enough precise and specified data: on the contrary it is mandatory to avoid every inference regarding not well supported occurrences, every boasting battles against too much "high" High Powers as against a wide "common sense", against unknowable, hidden enemies as against the unawareness of lay-people. Such a fight can put forward with some hope to succeed merely if pointing out and warning against them in a way the most precise, seriously studied, accurate defined: yet AVOIDING bare words or pitiful moaning one can fight on an acceptable level. To recognize the reality of "human external world", its connections, oppositions, changeable alliances is difficult even for inside trained people: how awful consequences could bring about to misunderstand facts with "opinions" and "feelings", and the "master way" to confuse "friends" with "enemies" and vice versa! How much fallacious is the forthcoming when deceptive naivety or obtuseness assure to be aware of who are the culprits and their plans to act! How is deceitful to "cry wolf" without giving any "how", "when" and "where"! Unfortunately we find ourselves at times reluctantly constrained not to ignore but to fight against empty objections and ... idle chatter of those who approach these pages believing them to be the fruit of mere “opinions”! How to warn – with trouble and also with apprehension – those who, faced with “abnormal situations” shoot haphazardly without preparation and with unprovable accusations. It is for this reason that we WILL publish only anomalies and memories which are truly clearly definable, and not any data and/or testimonial and/or shared story even if reliable in the long term. Any grouping exclusively focussed on fighting a “common enemy” is basically structured like a sect, meaning like a non-homogenous entity united exclusively to incorporate individuals and entities with very different situations united not through any sense of real cooperating community but by a blind hostility towards a homogenous enemy. United because they are against a common target: real or more or less hypothetical but however characterized to be beyond any effective opposition other than symbolic action.
Of “vital” importance? Naivety falling into superstitious gullibility and so open to foster “sect-like” organizations? Or even "derelict" prsons ready to be involved in "Cult-like" groups?
Sects or similar “cliques” offer support and consolation to frail people in search of a pseudo “happiness”, to sick people who aspires to the indifference of a confined “serenity”: not for nothing Delgado himself wrote a book entitled La Felicidad, rather than only express his ferocious principles in his research into a Psychocivilized Society. Or else they welcome and “console” the more desperate victims mourning over their fate. Real mishaps or real and documented suffering are so collectively and indiscriminately given at general attention: not as proper afflictions but as ACCUSATIONS against the hypothetical common perpetrators. From this step where can we arrive: see The first humanitarian war in history: Hitler and the Sudetenlanders. Hitler and Sudetenlanders? A postponed terrible World War? One more year as gift to advantage Nazism? (Definitely any subject alluding to conspiracy, international plots, secret history and underground politics allures a morbid fascination for a lot of naive or aggressive or blatant people. Merely on searching books or videos checking these words an hotchpotch of assorted titles floods: even a lot of titles - near hundred! - not only racist but considering Hitler himself in various strange connection with Anglo-American powers.)
| So built persecutory supporting groups have not to be confused with those focused instead on a very real COOPERATION, as happens for example in many associations of people ill from a particular pathology: their combined efforts being focused to better study their diseases and therefore better help doctors themselves. |
When private individual "victims" complain for haphazard harms to be held and consoled, how harmful results such customary confusion! little querulous people's private lamentation being maximized with the sure consequence of a minimization of the biggest collective happening and collective crimes as slaughters, lagers, wars! Of vital importance? How damaging can similar heterogeneous groups become also towards their own members! How many lay themselves open to the sneaking in of the true persecutors – the “wolves in sheep's clothing” – sects, cults, gangs, agents provocateurs, false victims, true - and just for this really sick and badly suffering - mads …: in every case real danger and certainly discredit! To act without knowledge of causes and with crass sermonizing, in disdainful ignorance, to engage oneself against hypothetical and elusive “enemies” instead of alleviate and/or avoid the real suffering and damage?
The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding... Don't be men of zeal without understanding almost a clinical definition of paranoia? After all not only true delusional mads can endanger, every intimate psychic disorder as a good fostering ground of vulnerability enacts against the whole public wellbeing.
<Neurosis absorbs anguish as a sponge.It is convenient, it gets as a mighty mummy. Even mild Neurosis as personal, intimate disorder affects private freedom and impairs individual concentration and attention; but - as told in this Italian writing it gets as a sponge helping to absorb anguish... Neurosis itself is personal but affects a great deal of people, and then, when collective, this lessened existence could become everywhere a fertile ground fitting to foster superstitions: taboo as are duping prohibitions, but also compelling orders with even more RAGE and CRAZE.
So, often with inconsistent reason, whichever impromptu sharing a "neurotic concern" can become widespread; but also whoever tricky arrogant can enter in this so open pathway towards an indirect mind-control. Imposed as a new Totem, every bogus fear thus at first menaces proclaiming - hypothetic - forthcoming damages, and then offers pseudo-guarantees if the "mind-controlled" people follows so established hoaxes or even so accepted swindles.
Real does be rational? Vital importance?
Here
we wish to send out a
message
and a caution
of vital
importance...Therefore
the lot of discoveries so gathered - and this was a real surprise
- got we aware that the SCATTERED
diffusion
of a lot of
offensive tools resulted almost
sure: as the matter of fact everyone can buy without difficulties every
kind
of actual weaponry,
every one can buy often terrible and performing engines even at a very
low
price. On the height of damage many of such engines are sold for
not harming uses: for amusement, for chasing rats, for sending away
birds...: not only
for ... obviously military drills or for harming chosen people...
But the foremost engagement of this whole work is never to choose; but if for us is mandatory either to avoid bare subjective description or - worse - to accept even if impressive FAKE misconception, also our directive is never to be surprised and denying every circumstance. Damaging and even serious harming actions can be performed with engines which can be produced as very real and even commercial tools, which can be bought even by everyone, even with banal order forms in Internet. These powerful and deceitful "energies" are surely NOT something as ghosts' tricks, or science fiction Star Wars Engines: they are realities which could be managed by everyone, also or mostly by not ever ethical persons, but it is deceitful to "cry wolf" without giving any "how", "when" and "where" - look on Pseudo-misteri e coinvolgimenti biologici/Fake-mysteries on biological targets.
Personal cases offer first hand authenticated files: the Authors of these files/chapters share their data with a solid documentation. After the book published the Suda Case with its FIRST HAND collected exact DOCUMENTS - "corrected" since the previous version had a serious error in the title, completed by the original series of illustrated documents to be seen or downloaded; and supported by another renewed file presenting personal pictures and a sample of artist's portfolio: Artist Suda: Presentation. Besides on regard of this case Segnalazione di allarme: internazionali is improved by an article - quoted also in Links di organizzazioni e iniziative protettetive, and detailed in Artist/designer Andrzej Suda case - implying how children kidnapping and emigrants' misleading could be "political" NOT only "criminal" facts.
Just referring to a real case of implanted abusive microchips it is possible to read a whole seriuos technical expertise on a pdf file and his experience explained by other data - mails etc. - in a new file LarsonReport.htm. Particularly the medical field (together with Civil Rights one) is very dangerously tangled and quarrelsome: look mainly at "historic" and "scientific" novelties - unfortunately often only in Italian since coming from Italian Organizations and/or Italian media - on Pagina scientifico-medica, on Malattie rare in offerta speciale noteworthy at lobotomia and at Metilfenidato e sindrome da deficit di attenzione e iperattività (on the two last files it is to be mostly noticed the specification - also in English - regarding the use of DSM-IV). But a totally renewed - step by step advancing very FIRST HAND - powerful documentation is rising and at once published on line on Esperimenti su bambine/i. This document regards a precise, in progress testimony of the splitting of multiple personalities: this pages are exactly what spontaneously wrote the person, thus its ITALIAN should not to be translated to preserve its genuineness. This testimony is so probatory to have to be held in many placements: on other files of the site - Segnalazione di allarme internazionali and on Testimonianze e dubbi and even on The guilt-free soldier very improved by this internal link - then also on another site/book regarding not “harmful facts” but a better consciousness till the children’s raising Today’s adults = children of YESTERDAY, Adults of today -> adults of TOMORROW).
Any way the international scenery of the Segnalazione di allarme internazionali file can be improved time by time by ever more "international" advices coming from personal interviews, personal mails or verified information from media: even a crime-movie fiction (produced by Italian RAI Fiction) - The Chinese wife - tells a story to be meditated since very alike to real facts happened to real persons. Any way sometimes doesn't be despised something coming from apparently simple fiction: if It's Abuse NOT Science fiction what does tell the trailer of the fiction/movie The chinese wife? Is totally a crime-fiction the description of implanted microchips on immigrants' body? a story of a criminal tycoon "protected" instead of normally sued, of a criminal international tycoon so powerful to hinder investigators also on committing other crimes? Can perhaps this story allude to real facts growing up and develop on a enormously spread international scenery?
But the foremost engagement of this whole work is never to choose; but if for us is mandatory either to avoid bare subjective description or - worse - to accept even if impressive FAKE misconception, also our directive is never to be surprised and denying every circumstance. Damaging and even serious harming actions can be performed with engines which can be produced as very real and even commercial tools, which can be bought even by everyone, even with banal order forms in Internet. These powerful and deceitful "energies" are surely NOT something as ghosts' tricks, or science fiction Star Wars Engines: they are realities which could be managed by everyone, also or mostly by not ever ethical persons, but it is deceitful to "cry wolf" without giving any "how", "when" and "where" - look on Pseudo-misteri e coinvolgimenti biologici/Fake-mysteries on biological targets.
Personal cases offer first hand authenticated files: the Authors of these files/chapters share their data with a solid documentation. After the book published the Suda Case with its FIRST HAND collected exact DOCUMENTS - "corrected" since the previous version had a serious error in the title, completed by the original series of illustrated documents to be seen or downloaded; and supported by another renewed file presenting personal pictures and a sample of artist's portfolio: Artist Suda: Presentation. Besides on regard of this case Segnalazione di allarme: internazionali is improved by an article - quoted also in Links di organizzazioni e iniziative protettetive, and detailed in Artist/designer Andrzej Suda case - implying how children kidnapping and emigrants' misleading could be "political" NOT only "criminal" facts.
Just referring to a real case of implanted abusive microchips it is possible to read a whole seriuos technical expertise on a pdf file and his experience explained by other data - mails etc. - in a new file LarsonReport.htm. Particularly the medical field (together with Civil Rights one) is very dangerously tangled and quarrelsome: look mainly at "historic" and "scientific" novelties - unfortunately often only in Italian since coming from Italian Organizations and/or Italian media - on Pagina scientifico-medica, on Malattie rare in offerta speciale noteworthy at lobotomia and at Metilfenidato e sindrome da deficit di attenzione e iperattività (on the two last files it is to be mostly noticed the specification - also in English - regarding the use of DSM-IV). But a totally renewed - step by step advancing very FIRST HAND - powerful documentation is rising and at once published on line on Esperimenti su bambine/i. This document regards a precise, in progress testimony of the splitting of multiple personalities: this pages are exactly what spontaneously wrote the person, thus its ITALIAN should not to be translated to preserve its genuineness. This testimony is so probatory to have to be held in many placements: on other files of the site - Segnalazione di allarme internazionali and on Testimonianze e dubbi and even on The guilt-free soldier very improved by this internal link - then also on another site/book regarding not “harmful facts” but a better consciousness till the children’s raising Today’s adults = children of YESTERDAY, Adults of today -> adults of TOMORROW).
Any way the international scenery of the Segnalazione di allarme internazionali file can be improved time by time by ever more "international" advices coming from personal interviews, personal mails or verified information from media: even a crime-movie fiction (produced by Italian RAI Fiction) - The Chinese wife - tells a story to be meditated since very alike to real facts happened to real persons. Any way sometimes doesn't be despised something coming from apparently simple fiction: if It's Abuse NOT Science fiction what does tell the trailer of the fiction/movie The chinese wife? Is totally a crime-fiction the description of implanted microchips on immigrants' body? a story of a criminal tycoon "protected" instead of normally sued, of a criminal international tycoon so powerful to hinder investigators also on committing other crimes? Can perhaps this story allude to real facts growing up and develop on a enormously spread international scenery?
Instead
some Authors
mix reality and fantasy in an
apparent not-fiction, or worse: spread on purpose some truth and
some damaging data promoting a lot of fake-assured misinterpretations.
Here we quote from a private very reliable mail a strong disavowal
against such deceit:
I
need to
tell you that I was alarmed
the other day when I received, from two sources, Brice/Sue's
announcement about the new project Brice/Sue wants to do, by getting a
bunch of mind-control survivors to send her information about their
histories.
... Icke, by the way, allegedly has been putting information out claiming that mind-control survivors were actually abducted or whatever by human-sized lizard-ET's. This, if true, is of great concern to me because the lizard-men/et crap was used as a hypnotic screen memory with high-level MC survivors so they would not be able to see the faces of the people who really abducted and harmed them. You can't prosecute or expose what you can't see clearly enough to remember. Anyway, if he is writing and presenting such materials, then in my opinion, he ought to be run out of the US on a rail, tarred and feathered. If he's not presenting such materials, then the information given me was blatant disinformation, and I will think otherwise of him when I am convinced it is so.
... Icke, by the way, allegedly has been putting information out claiming that mind-control survivors were actually abducted or whatever by human-sized lizard-ET's. This, if true, is of great concern to me because the lizard-men/et crap was used as a hypnotic screen memory with high-level MC survivors so they would not be able to see the faces of the people who really abducted and harmed them. You can't prosecute or expose what you can't see clearly enough to remember. Anyway, if he is writing and presenting such materials, then in my opinion, he ought to be run out of the US on a rail, tarred and feathered. If he's not presenting such materials, then the information given me was blatant disinformation, and I will think otherwise of him when I am convinced it is so.
Opinions or statements of facts and/or data?
It is typical of the planning of the whole of our activity to signalize concrete facts, news and information in the most precise way, drawn from original sources and not derived from second-hand materials, constantly verified through intersected and contextualized validations and comparisons; in other words we must confirm that our firm intention is NOT to suggest hypotheses, NOT to expound our views but to construe our work as a source of information and linkable data. Therefore from the point of view of exposing and documenting we consider that the possibility of using means of communication others than mere verbal language cannot be renounced; as in talking we avail ourselves of inflexions, tones and gestures, so even in writing integrating diverse languages - the most obvious being the visual one - can make communication and documentation more incisive and less debatable: in fact data and information matched with illustrations to justify them, are less likely to be confused with for sheer opinions, mere hypothesis or chatter. Our task is continually in progress; then we strongly need to be continually better and widely informed from others' experiences: may we ask for review or at least for comments? Through our long, patient, personalized work we contacted some so-called mind control websites' owners, so-called mind-control''s and other harmful misdeeds' victims..., some persons so-called interested etc. etc. ... What we - unwilling - learnt? That there are a lot, an unbearable lot, of “chatters” very proud to CHAT on regard of Big Games, a lot of not believable silly and unaware people, unaware also that every “word” can be followed and used - if not covertly siggested - by the other field and so able to become a trail towards danger: in fact we discovered to have met also really not reliable ones. Wolves disguised as lambs, true willing betrayers... but any way a lot of unaware naive unconscious effective betrayers... Furthermore and above all we emphatically maintain that we do not allude to any “motive”, much less to a “guilty” party or hypothesise are the “harms”, or “damage”, or “anomalies”, unless dealing with accusations proved in court (see for example the file/chapter Mind Control Victim Awarded $1 Millions).
We do NOT work on searching the “already known”, it is to say every time if possible we do NOT try to quote something published: on the contrary we search to have and display FIRST HAND documentation and/or direct data from original sources – it is to say: producers etc. - . So we are usually rather far from reporters and magazines. Our Association – scientific, professionally medical and if possible juridical - has instead a demanding and direct IN CHARGE many real persons really suffering and really in – sometimes – extreme danger: a very tiring and sickening task, a big part of our endeavor was to recognize, avoid or... quarrel against the above described hidden, disguised menaces.
Newspapers' data: Conspirancy Theories? Shadow Government?
Chicken
or
eggs? Which is the first
problem?
Or
better: has to be
preminent the will to persecute the
culprit instead to consider his victim? Or then: will the victims be
harmed again and again?
...victims
(lay
people) have a tendency to forget about the
patient (very often a victim) and to concentrate on the source
of evil
(whatever it is in our beliefs).
Such
irresponsible words
express very clearly one of the utter
difficulty to prevent damages and harms, to care and to promote a real
justice: in sum up to can positively help real suffering people, to
ascertain true ones from fake plaintive of worse from wolves in sheep’s clothing
- and/or
to positevely act in real behalf of whom is really needing help. Self
restraint identified with Top Power?
At February 2005 - media published as a new this sentence:
At February 2005 - media published as a new this sentence:
A
state
government panel in Oregon has barred a psychiatrist from practicing
medicine because he talked to his patients about the new world order,
saying such discussions could cause "emotional duress".... The
controversy began in 2002, when Wittkopp, in an interview with the
board's investigative committee, defended his use of reality testing
on patients. The report states that to help some patients, Wittkopp
gave them information on the New
World Order which he considers an
international effort to
establish world government and
a
world
economic system and a world religion.
On
regard of this -
unfortunately supporting and praising the
anti-professional psychiatrist's behaviour - a private exchange of
mails coming from "victims" gave these careless and discouraging words:
As
you
noticed not
only me but also Eleanor sent you the aforementioned article. Why?
Because is about the subject that touches us personally. The whole
issue
reminds me CHICKEN OR EGG WAS FIRST problem. We (me and
Eleanor) come from the opposite side than you. Both
sides have ONE THING IN COMMON - we care, we see the problem
and try to
find a
solution. You, as a professional, think about the patient first.
Me,
Eleanor
and other victims (lay people) have a tendency to forget about the
patient (very often a victim) and to concentrate on the source of evil
(whatever it is in our beliefs).
To
get
an
almost direct
answer to such way to think, one can use a real data as a
critical exemple. For choosing a
widespread subject
too much considered "puzzling" and "wicked" it is to be noticed and
just evidenced
here, that two data alluding to Bilderberg Group
and to lobotomy
and Nobel price
can give
the
opportunity to explain the methodological basics of our way to work
supported by other more
incisive
explanations and
questions recently
published. Regarding
the hypothetical New
world order and
weaponry,
messages from other
sites and
lists notice two
different cases to
improve internal links on Segnalazione
di allarme internazionali: Italia
and pubblicazioni
which
endorses
also a NEW mighty message with many links (for asks and doubts go to
the linked source).
Data
and
disclaimers regarding weaponry
are also recently posted on
Links
e
citazioni su segnali di pericolo: armi
and lesivi,
besides the
new apport on libera vendita.
Of “vital” importance? Why “sect-like” or even "Cult-like"?
Of “vital” importance? Why “sect-like” or even "Cult-like"?
THE
CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THE REMAKING OF WORLD ORDER
The Clash of Civilizations?: The Debate by Samuel P. Huntington
Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order
by Robert Kagan IT IS TIME to stop pretending that Europeans and Americans share a common view of the world, or even that they occupy the same world.
An
hypothetic New
World Order? On
September
1990 George
H.W.Bush called for a New
World
Order...
Pertaining to
whom? The
summary The
snake's head
on Beppe
Grillo's
Blog looks
to a part of the portrait of this enormous
power. Conspirancy
theories? Shadow
Government?
Self-restraint
identified with top
power?
(The World
Economic Forum (WEF) is a
Geneva-based foundation whose annual
meeting of top business leaders, national political leaders
(presidents, prime ministers and others), and selected intellectuals
and journalists is usually held in Davos, Switzerland. There are also
regional meetings throughout the year. It was founded in 1971 by Klaus M.
Schwab, a
business professor
in Switzerland.)
On
a mail
at June 24 2006 we received a message
regarding this
matter, endorsing some links sending to actual
newspapers articles
-
even to the front-page of Ottawa
Citizen
where on can litterally read: Secretive
power brokers' meeting coming to Ottawa?
a
group of very powerful individuals whose
objective is to create one
world government, based on an economic model from the Middle Ages,
he
said. This
would be a
post-industrial model where you have slaves and
slave owners.
May
24, 2006, Ottawa Citizen
(leading newspaper of
Canada's capital
city). [Snippets
from the original article]:
The
Bilderberg Group, a secretive organization of politicians and
business leaders from around the world, gave no public statements....
What they talked
about at the Brookstreet Hotel is still a secret.
The group meets annually, and is usually rumoured to discuss
international politics and business, from Middle East crises to oil
prices. The
meetings always
draw intensely
curious outsiders who believe the Bilderbergers
need to be exposed. One of these is Daniel Estulin, a
Canadian who moved to Spain about 15 years ago -- because, he says, the
Central Intelligence Agency tried to kill him. He feels safer in Spain.
I'm
much
further out of the reach of the secret service -- both
Canadian and American. I write the
stories everyone
else is
afraid to write, he
said. He and others staked out positions on the sidewalk where
they could get a clear view of the hotel's front door. For
hours, they watched through binoculars and telephoto lenses, waiting as
men and women got into limos. Cameras clicked, and the
Bilderberg-watchers scrolled through digital images afterwards, trying
to identify which member of the group they had just recorded. Alex
Jones, a documentary filmmaker from Texas, showed up with two of his
crew. Man,
this is just evil, he
muttered as he paced up and down, watching more
limos drive past. He was detained on his arrival in Canada, but says he
was released after other media asked questions about him. It's a
group of very powerful individuals whose
objective is to create one
world government, based on an economic model from the Middle Ages,
he
said. This
would
be a
post-industrial model where you have slaves and
slave owners. It's a
group of very powerful individuals whose
objective is to create one
world government, based on an economic model from the Middle Ages,
he
said. This
would
be a
post-industrial model where you have slaves and
slave owners.
They're
a
bunch of powerful people. They
meet in secret. I do
think that, by and large, many
members of the Bilderberg Group actually
see themselves in much the same way as the conspiracy theorists see
them, as this shadowy cabal out... to influence world
events.
Bilderberg is into... a new world order. They see themselves as head
hunters. They'll get an up-and-coming politician who they think may be
president or prime minister one day. As globalist industrialist leaders
who believe that politics shouldn't be in the hand of the politicians,
they try and influence them with wise words. Bildergerg's secrecy, I
think, harks back specifically to Henry Kissinger who... loves the idea
of being this shadowy, secret figure.
Any
way the Bilderbergers'
list
don't complete the directory of the world's Very
Important
Persons. Rumors - for the time being: only rumors - tell
that
there are, someone says ten someone forty, active High Powers
Groups sometimes enemies together sometimes allied, but
notwithstanding
ever potential source and efficient cause of dangers. Isn't a basic
duty to try to better know each group and its members or participants
and mostly their
condition on settled or volatile wealth instead to fix the attention on
only an
unique one? Surely doing such a
careful examination will get some unexpected surprises, or rather not
only unexpected than puzzling ones.
In
the void created
by such aloofness,
an
extraordinary conspiracy
theory
has
grown up around the group that alleges the fate
of the world is largely decided by Bilderberg.
Davos:
Wealth, power
and a sprinkling of stardust The World
Economic Forum gathers in a small
town in Switzerland tomorrow (Tuesday, 22 January 2008). Who
will
be there, and what's at stake?. For a few
days an
obscene
proportion
of the world's wealth and clout will be concentrated in one normally
obscure Alpine town. Some 27 heads of state or government; 113 cabinet
ministers; hundreds of chief executives, bankers, sovereign wealth fund
managers, economists and the media: about 2,500 participants in all.
This concentrated, eclectic mix of the top slice of humanity is part of
the "magic" of this mountain redoubt....it is no wonder the place will
be surrounded by barbed wire and intense security. If you've ever
wanted to know what the Swiss army is for (apart from inventing handy
little multi-tools), an attempt to penetrate the perimeter of Davos
will tell you, as 5,000 troops do their bit to protect international
capitalism from its enemies. The WEF gets under way this week, and
the
formal title of the week's proceedings, as ever, gives little away
about the true agenda. The Power of Collaborative
Innovation,
while
suggestive of the business elite's obsessions with the pace of
technological change,... The
prominent role
allotted to Mr Wang, while not entirely novel, is nonetheless
significant. This
year
at Davos there will be fewer figures from Hollywood, and rather
more
representing the new forces in the global economy – the
new
transnationals based
in China, India, other rapidly growing emerging
economies and the sovereign wealth funds that those
nations and the
petro-states of the Gulf now command. The prospects for
the BRICs
(Brazil, Russia, India, China and their smaller satellite economies)
have been one of the staples of international gatherings for years, but
now the ruminations have a little more point to them. In 2008,
for the
first time, China will contribute more to the growth of the world
economy than the United States. Double-digit growth in
China
should
still just be possible this year, and it alone seems to stand between
the world and a full-blown recession.... This is as it should be. The
event has been growing in importance and prominence since its
pioneering days in the early 1970s. In 1971 a German-born Swiss
economist named Klaus Schwab
hit upon the idea of an
eclectic,
informal, low-key, almost secretive gathering of the world's most
influential figures and founded a not-for-profit foundation to achieve
his ends.
In those days it had
much in common
with the Bilderberg group,
but
today the WEF
has left its
modest
beginnings way behind and actively seeks out the attention of the
world, whether it is to launch a campaign against World Poverty (as
Gordon Brown and Bono did in 2005) or to balance the needs and
aspirations of the old economies of the West, the emerging economies of
the east and the still poor billions in the south. ...
By Sean O'Grady
Pinay Cercle From EliteWiki Pinay Cercle - CIRCLE OF POWER by David Guyatt, 1999
Perhaps more sinister, and certainly more shadowy than the Bilderbergers, the "Pinay Cercle" is an "Atlanticist" right-wing organisation of serving and retired intelligence operatives, military officers and politicians that conspired to "affect" changes in government. Amongst other things they claim credit for engineering the election of Margaret Thatcher in the U.K. and may have been behind the ousting of Australia's Gough Whitlam. Now almost forgotten, the decade of the "Seventies" was a time of immense political upheaval, dirty tricks and incessant rumours of right-wing military Coup d'Etats in leading western democracies. Amongst the long list of resulting casualties of this "decade of tension" were Britain's Prime Ministers: Harold Wilson and Ted Heath, Australia's Gough Whitlam, Sweden's Olaf Palme, America's Jimmy Carter and France's Francois Mitterand. The more southern flanks of Nato's European axis: Portugal, Spain, Turkey and Greece converted rumour into chilling fact via the steel-blue glaze of gun-barrels. Italy, home of Pizza, the Pope, and Propaganda Due (P2) came in for its own brand of political fixit, courtesy of Uncle Sam's very own CIA. As the decade of the "eighties" slowly slipped above the now less than pink eastern horizon, right-wing beneficiaries of a co-ordinated international destabilisation programme gave their heart-felt thanks. Among them were Britain's Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher - Madonna of the Armaments industry - and America's less brittle, and considerably less acute, Ronald Reagan - humble originator of the mega-tax-buck-swallowing SDI "Star Wars" programme and also, thus, a valued friend of the boys at Guns R Us International. These two decades saw a proliferation of right-wing, quasi official and secretive groups that co-ordinated intelligence, propaganda and undertook covert black-operations around the globe. One of the most shadowy of all is the "Pinay Cercle", named after its founder Antoine Pinay, Premier of France in 1951. Known more simply as "Le Cercle" it is recognised as a more clandestine sister organisation to the already very secretive Bilderberg Group1 - a "behind-the-scenes invisible influence" network.
Both groups share a familiar membership which includes Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller. Each of these three luminaries of the international power network are, in addition to the foregoing, influential members of The Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations as well as being regular attendees at Britain's "Chatham House" - The Royal Institute of International Studies - shadowy twin to America's CFR.
Antoine Pinay was extremely influential in Europe and the United States, where he had forged links with President Nixon. Pinay attended the Bilderberg inaugural meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland during May 1952. By 1969, Pinay together with Jean Violet, a Lawyer working for the French Intelligence Service SDECE, and Archduke Otto von Habsburg, heir to the Austrian throne, formed Le Cercle, and secretly began recruiting men of influence as members.
The intention was to shift the political climate of Europe to the far right via a secretly financed campaign of propaganda, and to establish a private intelligence service that would work, unofficially, with the existing security apparatus of the west. Author Stephen Dorrill also believes there are serpentine inter-connections between Le Cercle and the Gladio network, a "stay-behind anti communist" military guerrilla force set up by Nato's Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) during the "fifties", that was largely composed of ex Nazis'.
.
By Sean O'Grady
Pinay Cercle From EliteWiki Pinay Cercle - CIRCLE OF POWER by David Guyatt, 1999
Perhaps more sinister, and certainly more shadowy than the Bilderbergers, the "Pinay Cercle" is an "Atlanticist" right-wing organisation of serving and retired intelligence operatives, military officers and politicians that conspired to "affect" changes in government. Amongst other things they claim credit for engineering the election of Margaret Thatcher in the U.K. and may have been behind the ousting of Australia's Gough Whitlam. Now almost forgotten, the decade of the "Seventies" was a time of immense political upheaval, dirty tricks and incessant rumours of right-wing military Coup d'Etats in leading western democracies. Amongst the long list of resulting casualties of this "decade of tension" were Britain's Prime Ministers: Harold Wilson and Ted Heath, Australia's Gough Whitlam, Sweden's Olaf Palme, America's Jimmy Carter and France's Francois Mitterand. The more southern flanks of Nato's European axis: Portugal, Spain, Turkey and Greece converted rumour into chilling fact via the steel-blue glaze of gun-barrels. Italy, home of Pizza, the Pope, and Propaganda Due (P2) came in for its own brand of political fixit, courtesy of Uncle Sam's very own CIA. As the decade of the "eighties" slowly slipped above the now less than pink eastern horizon, right-wing beneficiaries of a co-ordinated international destabilisation programme gave their heart-felt thanks. Among them were Britain's Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher - Madonna of the Armaments industry - and America's less brittle, and considerably less acute, Ronald Reagan - humble originator of the mega-tax-buck-swallowing SDI "Star Wars" programme and also, thus, a valued friend of the boys at Guns R Us International. These two decades saw a proliferation of right-wing, quasi official and secretive groups that co-ordinated intelligence, propaganda and undertook covert black-operations around the globe. One of the most shadowy of all is the "Pinay Cercle", named after its founder Antoine Pinay, Premier of France in 1951. Known more simply as "Le Cercle" it is recognised as a more clandestine sister organisation to the already very secretive Bilderberg Group1 - a "behind-the-scenes invisible influence" network.
Both groups share a familiar membership which includes Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller. Each of these three luminaries of the international power network are, in addition to the foregoing, influential members of The Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations as well as being regular attendees at Britain's "Chatham House" - The Royal Institute of International Studies - shadowy twin to America's CFR.
Antoine Pinay was extremely influential in Europe and the United States, where he had forged links with President Nixon. Pinay attended the Bilderberg inaugural meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland during May 1952. By 1969, Pinay together with Jean Violet, a Lawyer working for the French Intelligence Service SDECE, and Archduke Otto von Habsburg, heir to the Austrian throne, formed Le Cercle, and secretly began recruiting men of influence as members.
The intention was to shift the political climate of Europe to the far right via a secretly financed campaign of propaganda, and to establish a private intelligence service that would work, unofficially, with the existing security apparatus of the west. Author Stephen Dorrill also believes there are serpentine inter-connections between Le Cercle and the Gladio network, a "stay-behind anti communist" military guerrilla force set up by Nato's Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) during the "fifties", that was largely composed of ex Nazis'.
.
Lobotomy and.. Ministry for Foreign Affairs
It was brought
to our attention that
the Corriere
Della Sera, one of the most leading
Italian newspapers
published
a violent attack on lobotomy (Corriere: 'Not
only different
awareness').
A similar report published on the Corriere is in
itself most telling, but the indirect and underlying connection is far
more stimulating.
In
all, lobotomies
were
used on 40,000 to 50,000 Americans between 1936 and the late 1950s. Freeman
believed lobotomies worked because the procedure severed connections
between the frontal lobes of the brain and the thalamus, thought to be
the seat of human emotion, which the mentally ill apparently had in
overabundance. Although his theories have been discredited, Freeman was
one of the few psychiatrists of his era who believed that mental
illness had a physical biological component.
Moniz Lobotomy Stamp: This is an actual Portuguese stamp posted by Christine at Monday, August 01, 2005). In 1936, the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz introduced a surgical operation, prefrontal leukotomy, which after an initial period came to be used particularly in the treatment of schizophrenia. The operation, later called lobotomy, consisted in incisions that destroyed connections between the prefrontal region and other parts of the brain... The treatment became rather popular in many countries all over the world and Moniz received the Nobel Prize in 1949.
Antonio
Caetano de Abreu Freire Egas Moniz was born
in
Avanca, Portugal, on November
29, 1874, the son of Fernando de Pina Rezende Abreu and Maria do
Rosario de Almeida e Sousa. He received his early education from his
uncle Abbé Caetano de Pina Rezende Abreu Sa Freire, before
joining the Faculty of Medicine at Coimbra University. He received
further education at Bordeaux and Paris and became Professor at Coimbra
in 1902. In 1911 he transferred to the new Chair in Neurology at Lisbon
where he remained until his death. He also worked for a time as a
physician in the Hospital of Santa Maria, Lisbon. Moniz
entered
politics in 1903 and served as a Deputy in the Portugese
Parliament until 1917 when he became Portuguese Ambassador to Spain. Later in
1917 he was appointed Minister for Foreign Affairs and he
was President of the
Portuguese Delegation
at the Paris Peace Conference in 1918
Another comparable fact called our attention: Minister of Foreign Affairs and deeply implied in International Organizations and happenings was also the Italian doctor Gaetano Martino, University teacher in Human Physiology and Rector of Messina University, also and mostly Author with Moruzzi of a “classic” set book for future doctors: a text book for Medicine students dealing almost only with cat’s brain vivisection: in which the main subject was .... how to experiment on living cats' encephalons!
But if this is the antecedent to start from, it is fundamental to consider what can indirectly derive from it, in view of further considerations and research of a more general purport, pertaining not only to a bad use of medicine.
The Corriere is an independent surely not a "left-wing" newspaper: so in itself this article is by itself a very information, but the underlying indirect connection is far more stimulating.
Can one assume that, through some sort of easy making mechanism, a destructive planning out - analogous to that devised by Delgado, - not to mention Hitler - could have some relation with… Foreign policy?
Oaxes and rumors or true facts? Kidnapped normal children to construct artificial devilish "monsters"? "Multiple Personality Disorder"? It
is easy to
speak in a conjectural way on regard of "Multiple
Personality
Disorder". but here are depicted in total
spontaneity two
"personalities" - Monk
and Letitia
- the two
"multiples"
trained to become killers and spies after being built during structured
abuses.The "protagonist" of these terrible mishaps expressed this picture during a very poignant, painful flash-back, together with some very explanatory writings. The most of the texts are in Italian but a shortened translation in English can be reached on Esperimenti su bambine/i at the sub chapter: translation. 
 Tyrants don't devour you: they devour your FEAR.... lI libro dei senza paura - The book for fearless people: a hand book to teach children for fight their fears - Giunti (gruppo editoriale)  "Fear" believes to keep safe on building barricades: and then narrows spaces, knowledge, relationship and understanding... and widens on return new fearfulness and dependency. |
| And here below a mail presenting a new
book suggests a deep
method to investigate:
nevertheless of its subject and field of research regard only a single
case. Dear
Colleagues in the Fight Against
Organized Child Abuse,
The
Franklin Scandal, by Nick
Bryant,
has just been released.
For seven years, Nick Bryant has devoted himself tirelessly to the investigation of this case. He has flown all over the USA to meet the victims, earned their trust, and interviewed them in depth. He has poured through original documents, Omaha Police Department reports and internal memos, Nebraska State Patrol reports, Nebraska Department of Social Services reports, internal Boys Town reports, victim debriefings, hundreds of the ring's airline receipts, and court transcripts never before reviewed. He has scrutinized all of this data with a critical eye, and set his own standard of at least triple-corroboration for all of his facts. Nick Bryant has found irrefutable evidence of a cover-up of a transcontinental network of child sex trafficking by the FBI, Secret Service, and Department of Justice. Many of these children were accessed through the foster-care system; many were accessed through Boys Town. I feel that I know Nick Bryant well enough to say that his ethics and investigational rigor are impeccable. This book does not offer speculation. It offers facts. If any person or organization, e.g., the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, launches an attack on this book, they will find themselves defeated by a rock-solid wall of verified facts. This book is oddly pleasant to read - [as also the Wanda Karriker's book: Morning comes quickly] - The tone is friendly, personal, even funny at times. Nick Bryant shares with the reader his personal reactions to the unsettling events that occur during the investigation, and the evidence that he uncovers. Nick Bryant has made other major contributions to our world, including his book, America's Children: Triumph of Tragedy, addressing the medical and developmental problems of lower socioeconomic children in America. His writing on the plight of disadvantaged children has also been extensively published in many peer-reviewed journal publications. The Franklin Scandal may be his most ground-breaking work because it reveals evidence of complicity in the abuse of children by institutions that are supposed to protect them, and may help to make our systems more accountable and responsive to abused children. Nick's book, The Franklin Scandal, is being released this week, and is available at: www.franklinscandal.com . See the press release below. Note the connection of the Franklin case to ritual abuse in the second-to-last paragraph below. Feel free to circulate and re-post this message. Warmly, Ellen Lacter, Ph.D. Psychologist in San Diego, California, USA  PRESS RELEASE: New Book Exposes Pedophilia, Government Officials and Cover-up For Release: Immediately Contact: Kent Goodman, TrineDay Books Publicity Director (541) 954-8142 kgoodman@amselmedia.com Website: www.franklinscandal.com THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL, by Nick Bryant, will be the first commercially published book to tell the shocking true tale of the power elite involved in the most despicable crimes against children. These youths were used and abused for entertainment, and knew what would happen to them if there ever came clean. In one case, a young girl had been abused since the age of 14, she refused to recant her abuse, and she was sentenced to prison for 9-15 years on trumped up charges.  BoysTown statement: Every child who arrives at Boys Town has a story to tell. A story of neglect and abuse... of disappointments and devastation. You make it possible for us to provide a home, and more importantly, healing. Thank you for being a part of a bright future for our children. The nationwide trafficking ring was run by a pair of Republican powerbrokers who used the venerable Boys Town as a pedophile reservoir; they had access to the highest levels of our government, and connections to the CIA. Nebraska
legislators nearly exposed
the ring, but its unveiling had the potential to produce seismic
political aftershocks. This resulted in a rash
of deaths and a full
court press by federal law enforcement, including the FBI, Secret
Service, and Justice Department, not to mention the
mainstream media, effecting
an immaculate
cover-up of the trafficking
network. and a former US State
and federal grand juries in NebraskaAttorney for the District of
Columbia also played an
integral role in
the cover-up. Moreover, author Bryant shows that a number of officers
of the court who participated in the cover-up experienced upward
mobility in either the state or federal judiciaries.
Bryant
has spent seven years
researching this book and he’s traveled approximately 40,000 miles.
He’s had access to thousands of documents that would ultimately be
sealed by two grand juries. His documentation includes FBI reports and
interoffice memos, Omaha Police Department reports and internal memos,
Nebraska State Patrol reports, Nebraska Department of Social Services
reports, internal Boys Town
reports, victim debriefings, hundreds of
the ring’s airline receipts, etc. He’s also interviewed several of the
network’s victims who are now young adults.
The FRANKLIN SCANDAL also tackles the issue of ritual abuse. Indeed, some of the victims that Bryant has interviewed have confessed to being ritually abused. To corroborate their accounts, Bryant’s book highlights several studies published in academic journals that back up the reality of this heinous practice, including a study conducted by Young et al. published in the Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect -[look at newest scripts: Child Abuse & Neglect], and the Extreme Abuse Survey conducted by Becker et al. The author also discusses the Finders and sheds insights into its activities that have eluded many researchers. Nick Bryant’s writing has recurrently focused on the plight of disadvantaged children in the United States, and he’s been published in numerous national journals, including the Journal of Professional Ethics, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Journal of Social Distress and Homelessness, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, and Journal of School Health. He has also published a book, America’s Children: Triumph of Tragedy, addressing the medical and developmental problems of lower socioeconomic children in America. |
Sleeping reason breeds monsters and monsters? Then it is compelling to WATCH, to WATCH. to WATCH. Ever should be rejected not documented mere asserptions together with not probed even oneself's own feelings. DOUBTS must be ever the foremost GUIDES for sustaining to MIND and WIDE RANGE AWARENESS.
To consider a better understanding of the whole professional and cultural endeavor and not only of the site and books go to Home page, completed by Presentazione dello Statuto e dei Principi dell'Associazione, or also in English with the large, renewed file Presentazione e indice ragionato: come cominciare / Preamble: how to begin. The Parte terza: violazioni medicalizzate / medical violence - with the preparatory and miscellaneous chapter Pagina scientifico-medica - holds a widespread and continually renewed input on regard of deliberate medical malpractice.
Pagina scientifico-medica
Presentazione dello Statuto e dei principi dell'Associazione
Links e citazioni su segnali di pericolo
Segnalazioni di Allarme: Internazionali
Links Europei contro la Pedofilia, il Settarismo e gli Abusi Strutturati e/o Rituali
Ringraziamenti / Aknowledgement and thanks
Crucial: since holding true testimony and authenticated documents - any way mostly in Italian:
ESPERIMENTI SU BAMBINE/I
e related pdf
to be completed with IL PREZZO DEL POTERE, only with a short English excerpt
Objects are surely better "sincere witnesses" NUOVISSIME TECNOLOGIE? Advanced Technologies? Technologies Avancées? Spitzentechnologien?
to be completed and assessed by Pseudo-misteri e coinvolgimenti biologici / Fake-mysteries on biological targets
The Guilt-free Soldier
Artist/Designer Andrzej Suda's case, (Andrew) Suda: Presentation / Presentazione come artista
Andrzej (Andrew) Suda's DOCUMENTATION / DOCUMENTAZIONE
Suda correct pdf with its original pictures (*)
LarsonReport-Edit.pdf
LarsonReport.htm
TOTEM and TABOO: awful and fertile rise of new superstition
Delgado & Skinner
Psychocivilization and its discontents
Per concludere / Accomplisment
Modificazioni e novità
Another Web site and its related books expound explicit or only alluding considerations explaining our point of view and their roots: go to Consciousness and memory, My guides... my roots; besides the English index which endorses our basics as a real statement of meaning.
Arguments almost alike the ones held on this site can be read on the other site' one already published on its related book
Opinion, fact, complaint
For deeper and scientific information
Anamnesis? A way for healing...
and again on: Consciousness and memory
a parallel, even little different, page:TOTEM and TABOO: awful and fertile rise of new superstition
Sorry: only in Italian:
IMBROGLIO E ' I L CONTRARIO DI SVILUPPO. Dalla 'violenza contro il bambino' a 'tempo di mutamenti' e a 'la meglio gioventù
Quando la cartella clinica è terapeutica
Every kinks and quotation will be continually refreshed by
Book
cover: International
Copyright ©
January 4 2005
(Certificate 143935559)
Web
pages Copyright: International
Copyright ©
May 6 2006
(Certificate 149917786)
Book
copyright:
International
Copyright ©
August 5
2005 Associazione
italiana,
scientifica e giuridica contro gli abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici
- All rights reserved (Certificate
149917786)